Test the Below User's Moral Fiber

CONTROVERSIAL EDITION

Some sort of show was on radio 4 last night while i was making really badly burnt pasta that tasted like charcoal.

I.E Poster 1: 'Would you be [insert infamous mass murderer here]'s girl/boyfriend to stop the catastrophe?]
Poster 2: No. Would you, if it served Earth in some way, murder someone who was going to become a mass killer? (kill a person save a thousand)
etc, on and on.
I'll start.

Would you either a. go back in time to the stone age to save the world from a oncoming catastrophe or b. be rich and relax for the rest of your life knowing that the world will come to a end in 20 years because of you.

b) if choosing a) means a one-way trip. (Unless its because of death, then whatever)

Would you, a) punch someone for speaking ill of your relative or b) keep silent but you will attempt to spread bad rumor about them.

)a preferably with brass knuckles

Would you nuke a city full of perfectly innocent people, if you knew that there is one person there has a chance of killing 10 times as many people as you would if you did, or would you not

(Morals eh, so outdated)

Not.
The casualties resulting from the bombing would far outweigh the minimal chance of someone killing the others. Moreover, the blood is not on my hands if there is a murderer in that city, while nuking it does indeed place all of those deaths on my back.

Would you lead a blind man into danger and possibly risk his life simply because he wronged you before he went blind, or assist him?

Lead him to danger.

Would you kill your mother to save your father or kill yourself to save them both?

Kill my self, I have siblings that needs their parents alive.
You are given the chance to stop a mass murdererfrom ever killing again by sacrificingy your significant other. Or you can let him go, but he'll let her or him go.