say somthing about me!

[Duskz]

D= You're going like me, and you still have that avatar?

D= <--- Good sir.

[Ichthys]

This avatar was gifted to me, but under your command I shall change it. I shall now wait for said command.

[Duskz]

... *Sighs* .... No, I don't want to take away someones gift. -.- Bastard.

[Ichthys]

Your kindness to the gifter of my current avatar is very applaude-worthy.

[PrimezTime]

You misread my statement in a way that often gives away a dolt. So, I feel I must lecture you on the way you should have interpreted this and the ways that you could have interpreted this had I said otherwise.



The segmented highlighted in bold text states that, in accordance with your annoyance with Panda, mine equals that. I had omitted 'as you do' thinking that you would be able to pick up on this; I was wrong, I apologize. The first portion before thise signifies my recognition that I am not intending to be 'of the contrary'. My conclusion after the comma simply states my position on my argument which happened to be that I believed the thread should stop. I think I should clarify this right now, but I really don't care what happens either way to this thread. If you look back on the first page (I think?) you'll notice that I was the first to place a Attention Whore picture. My initial intention was to simply prod you. Obviously, I did the job and then some, however unattended that might be.

To go on, should I have been linking my annoyance with Panda to you, I might have stated something along the lines of: "Its not for me to be a marauder, cause I find both you and Panda equally annoying, but I understand the need for things to vanish." - "Its not for me to be a marauder, cause I find Panda equally annoying to you, but I understand the need for things to vanish" - "Its not for me to be a marauder, cause I find Panda equally, if not less, annoying than you, but I understand the need for things to vanish"

Or

"I find you annoying."

I don't really find you annoying, despite your abundance of criticism (for lack of word). *Shrugs* Well, I do find your fetish with Joker/'The actore of joker' to be disturbing. =|

I read this twice if that is any consolation to the effort you put in.

And all I can say is lighten up a bit. Don't take anything on here too seriously unless there is a cause for concern or a certain condition that might make the matter serious. I wasn't serious in any of my previous posting in this thread including the statement, "I'm as equally annoying as Panda?". I honestly don't let it concern me that much. It concerned me enough to make a post about it, but I didn't take offense to it.

Real good effort though. I haven't seen anyone go that in-depth to explain one sentence.

[goldgall]

lol it was not useless, the whole point of me making it was so i could get qoutes for my signiture :-)

...sneaky panda person. Or maybe I was just to stupid to see that in the first place -_-

[Duskz]

Real good effort though. I haven't seen anyone go that in-depth to explain one sentence.

Really? Shift around in the "Banned" thread. I'm sure I've done it -at least- 4-5 times. Trust me, its no effort on my part; I take pride in the worthlessness of it all. Thank'yar.

[The English]

love that panda < Chuck Norris

love that panda > Me.

[love that panda]

aw thanks<3

((that's defenetly going in the siggy! xD))

[The English]

Other things you beat:

love that panda > Divide by zero.