There's little percentage in doing what he's been doing, both with his original account and this one. I suppose this is an attempt to market oneself, but from my perspective, this does not look like an effective marketing strategy. Well, egotistical self-promotion rarely is, that's why Chuck D had Flava Flav as a hype-man; because there is nothing more epic fail than being your own hype-man.
I know for a fact I wouldn't want this guy anywhere near me in an RP. One of the things I do, when I am looking for a new RP, is to note who is in it and decide whether or not I want to put up with them. One of the things I do when running a new RP is to consult my list of 'rut-roh, trouble' people.
I'm pretty sure a lot of other people do as well, because we've all seen the egos derail our RP threads.
It's like Act I, Scene 2 of Julius Caesar, except the guy crowns himself anyway and just gets laughed at. Oy vey.
There is also something deeply unsettling about the attempt to make it sound more pretentious with the addition of an acute to the e. It makes me never want to use that word again. Ever.
Look, basically Grandmaster is trying to feel better about himself by mounting that pedestal, except it's more like a scaffold and he's got plenty of rope. My advice to anyone in here is to stop worrying about getting approval from guys like him, who set themselves up as authorities precisely so they can playact that authority role and get off on it, and just enjoy your RP. Write for yourself, not for some grandstanding egotist with delusions of his own greatness who is just using you as a vehicle for his validation and egotistical self-gratification.
tl;dr: Dear reader, heed generaldisaster's advice on here, not Grandmaster's.
Last edited by HeySeuss; 08-05-2011 at 10:16 AM.
-
"The time you enjoy wasting is not wasted time."
- Bertrand Russell
Actually dealing with the 'élitist' (hah I made a funny) is rather easy. Then again that's prolly largely because advanced RP's are easier to keep peace in. Different opinions as to what is good roleplaying/behaviour itself is not an issue. For a clash between opinions in advanced there's an easy four-reply program for the GM.
- "Hey guys, mind taking your discussion somewhere else? That's not what the OOC is for."
- "Dude, I warned you. I really don't wanna be like all threatening you with GM-powerz and whatnot, but this really oughta stop or there'll be consequences, aight?"
- "Right... So, remember how I asked you to keep the BS out? Now I'ma have to ask you to leave the RP, think that'd be better for all parties their sanities."
- *report*
In case you're not the GM, we got only three replies.
- "Listen mate, we disagree, that's cool, but I really don't think the OOC is the place for this or that this is going to lead us anywhere. So let's just agree to disagree and focus on the RP, shall we?"
- *PM GM* "Hey, X keeps hassling me about Y even though I asked X to stop. Could you step in? It's becoming rather bothersome."
- *report* or leave the RP
Advanced tends to have a more side-line attitude and people are slower to reply and so retaliation is more aimed at a single person than an entire thread, so people aren't focused on destroying RP's entirely (casual RP's can be so much harder when shit hits the fan.) Also because people reply less frequently, it often doesn't escalate to major levels overnight. These things can be resolved really easily, more often than not.
I haven't been in a lot of advanced threads lately though, given what generaldisaster and heyseuss got to say, the 'elitist-era' is over (we actually had a period of a lot of advanced rp's being filled with stuck up assholes) and things are back to normal; which sounds great. Now if only the writing surpassed one notable event every three paragraphs ;p
Seriously though guys, I think we're all done with this thread.
we have such sights to show you
Hi, Keeper!
Élitists of an even higher calibur were recognized as grandmasters.Not to be an ACTUAL elitist, but I've seen you write. It's nothing spectacular. Nor have I ever once seen anyone call a truly amazing writer a grandmaster. I've played an ACTUAL grandmaster(chess) as a kid. It's offensive you're trying to take a title of respect you've not earned.They do not act arrogant or self-centered.
They are normally humble and polite, honorable and respectful.
So a preference for lacking magic and the ability to do truly unique and amazing things makes you an "Élitist" because you do not have the capacity to do it and keep it from being god modding? It makes ME an elitist for looking down on melee combat. I find it dull and tedious because there's a limit and only so much you can do. Even the best writers can only do so much with melee, without resorting to magic/tech to make it interesting. I live close enough to LA that if I wanted to watch a REAL street brawl instead of some nerds "punching" it out online, I could go do so. Or just visit a hockey game.Élitists generally try to fight unarmed or with melee weapons only, since they view skill differently as one's ability to restrain themselves. If you try to use magic against an Élitist, they will most likely assume you're either a novice at hand-to-hand or a coward at fighting.
To be fair, I'm more annoyed you've not been banned off for multiple accounts. Or this threat been put into spam, where it clearly belongs.
Oh, and to add in - General, your words are both elegant and OBVIOUS(no slight intended toward you), yet he will never quite understand your meaning. You're always a good read. <3
I've read this thread with an expression of bafflement and confusion that makes me wonder if my face will ever return to its original format, because I'm quite honestly in awe of the simple diagnostics of managing to place ones head so far within ones rectum. I also dont understand where the guidance in this guide was... i was personally hoping for some form of guide on to the best things that make a good rp post, hopefully looking for something i could add to my own.
To be honest, I had no idea that elitists or masters and grandmasters were present within the roleplaying community until today, admittedly i've been shut off in a far off cornor of a forum and this is really the first site i've branched out to.o I also thinks that sucks if its true, I think good posts should be rewarded and good writers should know it but I mean who would bestow the title of elitest. I've met some reportedly excellent rpers and thought their posts were shit, their attitude arrogant and irritating, the best writer i've ever met was a proverbial noob, she taught me more about writing than any teacher or elitest.
I guess a forum i think its natural the more posts you have and the more good comments people give to you that you'll get more respect from people and be bestowed such titles. However i dont think you should be able to transfer the respect from rp to rp, as each of us have different standards and different qualities and different expectations. Some people might look for grammatical accuracy, evidently not myself, some people impressed by detailed histories, myself, i look for posts that make me feel like I'm there, i love the description of a post, especially if its put in an elegant and flowing manner, you turn a lovely metaphor, i'm in the palm of your hand, shove in a bit of alliteration and some vivid imagery and well.... lets just say what happens isn't pretty.
However I'm sure alot of people find all that flowery crap dull, they dont want to know what i smelt like thus just want you to kill it in a badass awesome way. Things that are foreign and foreign expectations mean that our elites on one sight might have a different impact on another.
I'd just like to add you were bestowed the "title" of grandmaster and congratulations too you but you seem to have made little positive impact with the posters of this site. Quite honestly i would have had far more respect for you if you'd given some form of advice on rping and actually shared your experience rather than given us a very wordy speech about your awesomeness.
Honestly, if you've got shit to teach hell i'll learn it, i'm nervous about trying the arena simply because the clinical level of detail doesnt suit my style of writing and that intimidates me.
I'm trying to work out my point but I'm happily rambling, reading back I dont think i had one really but i guess it suits the nature of this "guide".
(sorry my bad, didn't see the length of time on the last post sorry to perform necromancy, delete if you wish)
With that said, I will gladly hand over my title to anyone who can authentically defeat me in turn-based online fighting. But until that happens, I will wear my title, as it was something given to me which I deserved, and which I do still take pride in...http://www.historyofrp.proboards.com...ead=468&page=2
So what does it mean to be a "good roleplayer"? No matter where you are from, the standards are usually all the same (or at least I hope they are). To be a good roleplayer is to be a good role-model for roleplayers. Whether you consider yourself to be an "elitist", or whether you consider yourself to be someone who just likes to roleplay, there are always standards we should follow, and which often are neglected by the roleplayers who have the most responsibility.Originally Posted by HistoryOfRP
Do I regret having started this discussion? No, because if I had not started this thread, I would not have learned anything by it. Personally, I think everyone should have something to gain from their mistakes. If you do not learn from your flaws, then you will remain flawed, well after you have already been recognized and labelled as an advanced "veteran" of roleplayers. In order to become good leaders, we must be willing to follow, and at times, accept when we do things the wrong way. Only then can we expect to grow, and thus eliminate those flaws in our personalities which hold us back.
My guide is this, so let it be simple. A "good roleplayer" is one who is honest. It is someone who is kind and friendly, yet discerning and cautious. It is someone with discipline and wise judgement, someone with respect and dignity who is able to lead by example through actions, words, and good moral behavior. A "good roleplayer" does not have social problems. A "good roleplayer" can communicate openly and honestly, with a sense of familiarity and comfort. It is someone who is not easily angered or upset, someone with patience who does not like to argue, but who is also unyielding to misconceptions. A "good roleplayer" is someone who is brave enough to fight, but smart enough to restrain themselves. It is someone with manners who does not go trolling, flaming, cussing or lying. A "good roleplayer" is one who has honor, who practices diligently and constantly seeks new learning. It is someone with a respect for roleplaying, someone who strives to improve their typing skills and social skills. It is someone who knows the history of roleplaying, who is up-to-date with current events around and within the roleplaying community. A "good roleplayer" is not arrogant, but someone with a sense of humility who serves the roleplaying community, and finds honor in its traditions. In short, a "good roleplayer" is someone who is fun to roleplay with, and someone who has fun roleplaying.
Sincerely,
Grandmaster
THE
ROLEPLAYER'S CREED:
Standards all roleplayers should embrace:
I will maintain the illusion of the game by staying in character whenever possible. I will withhold out of character comments until absolutely necessary and even then I will whisper or privately message them to the other players.
If I discuss the game with other players out of character, I will not allow my character to be influenced by this knowledge without express permission of the other players. I will take the time to allow my character to learn these things on his or her own during the course of the game.
I will separate myself as a player from my character as much as possible. While I understand that a lot of myself goes into my character and because the game is so very intense often real emotions will be drawn from me as a player, I also understand that my character is not me.
If I am not in the mood to play, I won't interrupt other people's games by coming into it out of character. I will find others who are not in character and go somewhere meant for out of character discussion.
I will not use my character as a vehicle for racism or bigotry. I will not use my character to promote child pornography or bestiality. I, as a player, understand that there is no room in the real world for such things and will, to the best of my ability, not let it seep into the virtual world as well.
If I, as a player, feel that my character has been treated unfairly or that another character has overstepped the bounds of their abilities, I will approach the other character's player privately and discuss the situation in a calm adult manner and try to come to a resolution or compromise.
I will accept the hand that is dealt me in the game, understanding that it is a game and it's not about winning or losing, but about playing.
I will not allow setbacks in the game to be blown out of proportion. If I am overly emotional about what is happening, I will step back and not play until I can compose myself.
I will not carry grudges against fellow players. My character might not like another character, but again, I am an adult and understand that they are 'characters' and not the player that portrays them.
If I find that I simply can not get along with another player, I will avoid playing with them. But I will do so in a way that does not draw attention to this and I will not badmouth or otherwise slander the other player as such actions only makes myself look bad.
If my character is killed, I will obviously grieve for the loss, but I will also view the situation as an opportunity for me to grow as a player. By starting anew with a fresh identity, I will be able to leave all the negatives of that character behind - any grudges, dislikes or just plain bad habits- and take away the good, thus making my next character even better and more interesting.
I, as a player, will keep an open mind and allow people to play their characters the way their imagination leads them regardless if their interpretation matches that of some book, guideline...or creed.
Written by Calista of Dark World By Night.
The original document can be viewed on DarkWorld by Night.
And actually, scratch that. I will hand over my title, if you can even beat one of my disciples in turn-based online fighting. Forget about challenging me or my dignity, let's see if you can even defeat one of my trained students, or any of the masters who teach along with me. If you can just beat one of them, I will drop my name and close down my school...
Does that sound fair?
Last edited by Grandmaster; 11-06-2011 at 12:35 AM.
I don't understand this drive to continually and unsuccessfully import the standards of another site to a community that is perfectly comfortable with itself. Especially since the community that we're supposed to be in awe of is comparatively puny. I'm pretty sure much of the Arena feels the same way about this as well.
You never earned a title on the Guild, in the Arena on this site. You never put in the time to do that and therefore don't have the chops (that's what we say in professional cooking to denote whether or not someone has proven they warrant the position they are in.) You just showed up and crowned yourself and that's probably why you encounter a lot of static from members of this community. Some of us came from other communities where, hey, some of us were kingshits. But the thing that always happens in any community is that unless they know your former community and respect it, you always start at the bottom again.
That's true if you change careers and it's true if you change roleplaying communities -- instead of long treatises on how awesome you are, you have to prove it...from the ground up.
The tl:dr is tabbed below, however, and this encapsulates the thrust of this post.
Last edited by HeySeuss; 11-06-2011 at 07:46 AM. Reason: Just tightened up a sentence for readability.
-
"The time you enjoy wasting is not wasted time."
- Bertrand Russell
Hi
Well, this was a turn for the worst.
Should I forget the dictionary too?
Yes, they have.
Misconceptions? Like?
Many people who try to work harder also like to not be called douche bags.
Douchbags.
... no such thing.
Inflated-egoists**
... another turn for the stupid.
Yeah, they just wrote incredibly long boring walls of text.
False?
Douchebaggery is on the drop? Yay!
Dangit.
They only care about sounding pretentious. Hence the title.
... okay, yeah, not true.
And yet, you posted a wall of text on butthurt about defeat.
Pretentious ones!
*double take* wait, what?
Okay, sir, you have now reached the point of being incredibly silly. I wonder if you're taking this from some obscure Monty Python skit now.
How many guides have you posted?
Unspoken means unspoken... not spammed across a forum online.
See above point.
I totally wanna see this history book now.
... how so? Proof?
It's called aura of pretentiousness.
Again, lol.
Then they aren't elitists. Elitists are people who are full of themselves, and it is a very basic form of discrimination.
... I need to make a drinking game for your post. Every time you're absurd or silly, I take a shot.
What a vast old tradition!
*racism joke*
Yeah, in that corner of the internet that no one else could get into.
So, they put themselves aside and circle jerked to their own egos.
Why make so many rules up then?
Did the sites have rules?
It's called e-peen size.
By who? Other elitists?
Wait, did you just capitalize elitists mid-sentence? Really? Have you done that already before? That's just silly *takes a shot*
Character development and plot were the original fighting styles.
They were above humanity, obviously. Except, that, you know, that contradicts the very meaning of the word.
... *takes a shot*
So, roleplaying?
WAIT, you lie, you just earlier said they DID make distinctions. Heck, they even make distinctions in their names alone! *takes a shot*
Just some people were treated MORE equally.
... *takes a shot*
Circle jerk?
Which is a nice thing. Too bad that contradicts the nature of elitism.
Friendship is also Magic.
... so, like, most every single roleplay on this site I've been a part of?
Citation needed.
I had a level 80 pretentiousness score.
Earned writing skill? What? *takes a shot*
... citation needed.
Or godmodding.
Oh, coming full circle then.
They have transcended that nonsense, amimrite?
You know, following all those rules and stuff without them being there.
... almost? *takes a shot*
*headdesk* yeah, hyperbole times infinity.
However, a more pretentious person is a higher level person.
Yeah, cause all that imaginary energy is so limited, and shit. I need an imaginary power generator in order to write my roleplays, I swear. Bills are piling up too
Because they have no rules. Right?
I fight by doing nothing. I'm more restrained. Am I the greatest elitist now?
But they don't think anything different of you, as there are no distinctions, ja? *takes a shot*
Because staying away from other types of fighting isn't cowardice.
Not traditional elitism. They tend to be overly present and pretentious. Like you.
Oh dear lord, this is just getting worse.
Following oh so closely that series of rules that doesn't exist. Also, highly disciplined roleplayers. Really? Really? I think you're taking an online hobby WAY too seriously.
This is OOC, and I'm getting levels of egocentricism WAY over 9000. *breaks scouter*
They only call themselves names. Pretentious names.
LOL
LOL * 2
More pretentiousness!
Following more of those rules you don't follow, right?
LOL
LOLOL
LOLOLOL
LOLOLOLOL Do I need to quote you back all the stuff you've said that goes against that?
Which is why you're teaching people?
So the people you teach can never be as good as you, because they were told what to do?
Not really, from what you've posted here.
For some reason, the following quote has come into my head.
"The best kind of abstinence is the involuntary kind"
So, why do you guys scoff at one-liners? Isn't that showing restraint on size?
And talk down to them.
... *takes a shot*
Also, they are self contradictory. That doesn't help either.
And they are quite pretentious. Also, how many times did I use that word?
Also, I believe I'd be dead if I took real shots for every time you were absurd.
Thank you for reading, folks!