Reply With QuoteI meant
Attack result - defense result
And I'm off to a late-night class, so bbl
I know little of mathematics, but I'm pretty sure multiplication and subtraction are not good bedfellows. You could just jack up the power of the attack equation considerably, or perhaps just times the end number by 10 or something.
Signature by the talented Chibisuke Chan!
We play the hands of cards life gives us. And the worst hands can make us the best players.
I meant
Attack result - defense result
And I'm off to a late-night class, so bbl
"You try not to get anybody killed, you wind up getting everybody killed"
-Wesley Wyndamn-Pryce
Like I said, multiplication and subtraction aren't good bedfellows. The insides of the equation are all multiplications.
Bye!
Signature by the talented Chibisuke Chan!
We play the hands of cards life gives us. And the worst hands can make us the best players.
What multiplication would be in there? I'm not getting youOriginally Posted by Heroguy
My straight up attack - def would not involve the x10 you proposed, if that's what you're talking about
"You try not to get anybody killed, you wind up getting everybody killed"
-Wesley Wyndamn-Pryce
Hm? Oh! Years of algebra made me think XdY was a multiplication thing.
We could just multiply XdY and Xdb instead of adding them, too...
Signature by the talented Chibisuke Chan!
We play the hands of cards life gives us. And the worst hands can make us the best players.
'd' refers to die rolls
As in rolling X dice with Y sides
"You try not to get anybody killed, you wind up getting everybody killed"
-Wesley Wyndamn-Pryce
Am aware. That's still a type of multiplication, though... just with more random chance.
Signature by the talented Chibisuke Chan!
We play the hands of cards life gives us. And the worst hands can make us the best players.
die rolls can be subtracted from die rolls withour trouble, can't they?
"You try not to get anybody killed, you wind up getting everybody killed"
-Wesley Wyndamn-Pryce
They can. Though the simpler you make it the easier the calculations will be. Could just have a flat all the attack value added together = side of attacking die roll minus all the defense value of defenders = side of defending die roll = casualties.
Might need some balancing if the numbers get weird.
Could you create an example to describe that? I'm not following you
"You try not to get anybody killed, you wind up getting everybody killed"
-Wesley Wyndamn-Pryce
Posting Permissions
