View Poll Results: Vote for the best entry!

Voters
6. You may not vote on this poll
  • Entry #1

    2 33.33%
  • Entry #2

    0 0%
  • Entry #3

    1 16.67%
  • Entry #4

    1 16.67%
  • Entry #5

    2 33.33%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: WOTM #19 Voting (Advanced)

  1. #1

    WOTM #19 Voting (Advanced)



    Theme: Creation

    Explained: A story about the creation of something, be it metaphorical or literal.


    Components:
    • The story deals with creation in an artistic, metaphorical sense.
    • The story deals with the literal, technical creation of something non-living.
    • The story deals with the creation of a universe.
    • The story deals with the creation of mankind/society.
    • The story is from the perspective of a creator, be it metaphorical or literal.



    Rules for Voting:
    • Read ALL entries.
    • Vote on your favorite entry.
    • Please post explaining your vote and why.
    • Please provide helpful feedback on the entries.
    • Do NOT post anything insulting or offensive about the entries.
    • Do NOT vote for your own entry.
    • Do NOT tell others which entry is your own.


    Components required for advanced entries: 2

    The Entries:











    Theme & Components Provided By:

    General Guidelines For All:


    Please use this thread to comment on and discuss entries according to the rules listed above. Participants in the contest are allowed (and encouraged) to vote and comment as freely as a non-participant, provided that they do not vote for themselves, and they do not give away which entry is theirs. When reviewing entries, a faux review of one's own entry to preserve anonymity is acceptable.

    If a participant sees a formatting error in their entry that they believe to be the mistake of the managers, they may contact a manager privately to have it fixed. Managers will only fix mistakes that were their own fault from putting together the voting threads, and will not fix formatting errors that the author made upon submission, nor typos, etc.

    _________________
    Banner Thanks To: love that panda.

  2. #2
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    14
    It looks like all the spacing failed in the entries. It's making them very difficult to read.

    I know I personally fixed the spacing in mine before I sent it, but its gone now.

    Any way we could fix this?

    NOTE: Same thing happened with this post. I hard returned and put an extra line between these, but it appears on the thread as if I didn't.
    Last edited by Empress J; 11-06-2012 at 03:52 PM.

  3. #3
    Female Geek Kagamine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Somewhere with wi-fi.
    Posts
    31,532
    Quote Originally Posted by Empress J View Post
    It looks like all the spacing failed in the entries. It's making them very difficult to read.

    I know I personally fixed the spacing in mine before I sent it, but its gone now.

    Any way we could fix this?

    NOTE: Same thing happened with this post. I hard returned and put an extra line between these, but it appears on the thread as if I didn't.
    This issue has been addressed in the problems/suggestions forum, really it's just a problem with your browser. Internet Explorer has a lot of problems with the new version of the site, not displaying spacing between lines being one of them. I'm not sure when administration will get around to fixing this or if they will at all, but for now, switching to Google Chrome or Firefox should fix the problem.


    WOTM #26 Guidelines thread is up! This month's theme is Evil Wins! Let's see those entries!!

  4. #4
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    14
    Thanks...I use both Internet Explorer and Firefox...just depends on what computer I'm using.

  5. #5
    Gray Hunter Alphakoka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Where I need to
    Posts
    14,798
    So, here's my thought for the entries:
    Entry one is a little bit too all over the place, particularly around the part where you're starting to switch use between email format and bolded.
    Entry two is a bit too cluttered although I have to say it has great idea and nice execution. Though some space would be nice.
    Entry three, nicely done with the poem format.
    Entry four, dark, and rather creepy I must say with a side of disgust, if that's what you're after, I'd say you did a great job.
    Entry five is my favorite so far, though I find it a bit hard on which component you're using.

    So, in relevant to the theme and my preferences, I vote 3.

    http://alphakoka.minitroopers.com
    Credit to Harby the Australian Harbringer.



  6. #6
    Female Geek Kagamine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Somewhere with wi-fi.
    Posts
    31,532
    Quote Originally Posted by Alphakoka View Post
    Entry two is a bit too cluttered although I have to say it has great idea and nice execution. Though some space would be nice.
    Personally I think #2 had a lot of issues besides space. Though yes, paragraphing really needs to be improved. These are mainly just blocks of dialogue. Come to think of it, really the whole piece is dialogue. This author needs to rely on dialogue less, since it's the bulk of the piece, which is rather irritating, especially since it makes it near-impossible to form proper paragraphs, instead just blocks of dialogue that separate scene from scene. Just... don't do that. Please. That last "paragraph" especially was enormous. (Also, you should use quotation marks for dialogue, not apostrophes, but, small things.)

    Aside from execution, there are a few other things in the story that don't quite add up, too. Like the mention of how intelligence cores are really made; what purpose did that serve? A small mention like that seems like it's foreshadowing something else, or at least alludes to something else. But, no. The main characters never learned of it, and it never came back into the story. It was just... meaningless, and could've (and should've) just been trimmed from the story. So why did you leave it in? So far all it's done for me is confuse me.

    Entry five is my favorite so far, though I find it a bit hard on which component you're using.
    Hah, well, the way this month's components were set up, "creation" really could mean literally anything- even if it's not exactly a tangible something.


    WOTM #26 Guidelines thread is up! This month's theme is Evil Wins! Let's see those entries!!

  7. #7
    Tau Commander Brovo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Tau High Command.
    Posts
    7,946
    EDIT: Added Entry #3's review. Entry #4's review is under edits. Entry #5's review has yet to be done--soon, I swear sir!

    Brovo's Technical Reviews!

    That's right, the ever so demanded technical reviews are coming back full swing. I've deduced what made my work load so insanely hellish and have thus deduced how to bring down the work load. So, Advanced, look out, here I come swooping in from above to test your entries with everything I can think of in the book of analysis and argumentation as per request to bring it back. Multiple times. Thanks for not giving up on it. Anyway, to quickly state to those both familiar and unfamiliar with my reviews, this is a two-part information and warning.

    Firstly, I review the technical aspects of a piece. I do not allow emotions to sway into my perspective though I will note if a piece is aiming to target at specific emotions. Instead I target things such as plot integrity, logical event coherency, consistency, control and mastery over language choice, basic spelling and grammar, plot structure, characters and characterization of persons places things concepts and more, metaphor and analogy, "depth", and more. I do NOT target "how I personally feel" or anything along those lines unless that is the only logical way I can review that particular part of the work.

    Secondly, I do not hold back. I don't withdraw punches. If an author did something wrong, I will call that author out on it. Any authors who have chosen to withdraw from being reviewed I won't review--That isn't to say that author is "bad", just that they have made a personal choice not to be reviewed, and I will respect that choice. Those that have invited criticisms and review I will review. I will point out what you did exceptionally right or bright especially if it makes other entries pale in comparison in that area, but I will also point out grievous and gaping wounds in the plot or the characters, or if a metaphor fails to deliver its message. Essentially: I will blatantly tell the author that they screwed up, however, I will also tell that author how they screwed up and generally, if appropriate, how they can fix it in the future. I do constructive criticism, not criticism for the sake of criticism.



    Entries 1 & 2 & 3 done! 4 Is in editing stage & 5 has yet to be done but don't worry, with this new review style I'll get to you soon!

    Again, to reiterate my warning from before: I do not pull back my punches. If an author does something wrong, they did it wrong, and I'm going to point it out on the technical level. Please do not take personal offense, this is meant to assist authors, not personally assault them.

    Now that I've stressed this point, I feel comfortable putting out entry reviews #1 & #2.











    Last edited by Brovo; 11-09-2012 at 09:23 PM.



  8. #8
    Whew. Finally finished everything I needed to do. I didn't get to write up an entry for this month, but I'll get started on some reviews.


  9. #9
    Congratulations Tamefisher and Jorick!





    Like the past two months, we once again see a tie in the polls, meaning that the WOTM voters this month have decided that two entries in this competition were worthy of the winning title instead of just one. The polls tied between Tamefisher's story of the struggle of an author trying to create a solid, publishable work, and Jorick's interesting story of the truth behind the election process, creating a perfect image of one's candidate for voters to make their decision based on. With all the ties in advanced lately, it's exciting to see which one of our advanced regulars- or perhaps even a newcomer- will pull ahead and get a victory to themselves. Until then, though, Tamefisher and Jorick can both enjoy their second advanced WOTM win.

    Tamefisher and Jorick: Please PM Contra Fates about your custom user titles.

    I now encourage all writers who participated this month to use the next couple days to reveal themselves and respond to comments/critique given before the next Guidelines thread is up.

  10. #10
    Magnificent Bastard Jorick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    16,723
    Well, I was the author of Entry #5. Another tied victory for me, neat. Thanks Aries and Holmishire for the votes.

    I might put up reviews later/tomorrow, but doubtful. I just lack the motivation and such because I'm distracted by more entertaining things. Seems like other folks had that same thought, given the general lack of reviews, but I'll answer the one sort of review I got.

    Quote Originally Posted by Alphakoka View Post
    Entry five is my favorite so far, though I find it a bit hard on which component you're using.
    I went with a somewhat abstract concept, foreshadowed by the title. Creation of the truth rather than of a physical object. I used the following components:

    "The story deals with creation in an artistic, metaphorical sense." Harvey 'created' the truth in a both artistic and metaphorical sense. He took the facts of what happened and twisted them into a particular truth, thus creating that truth.

    "The story is from the perspective of a creator, be it metaphorical or literal." Harvey was the creator, it was from his POV, voila.

    It was very purposely not a literal physical creation that anyone could see because I thought that would be overdone. It seems you voted for Entry #3 over mine because of my loose interpretation of the theme, so maybe I could've done more to make it obvious. No worries though, thanks for being the only person so far to give any comment on my story.


    Did you know we have a Writer of the Month contest? Come join it.
    WOTM #26: Evil Wins is open and accepting entries through June 4th.


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •