Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Why We Focus on the Presidency

  1. #1
    SupidFox <3 Foxes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,368

    Why We Focus on the Presidency

    Hi I'm a political science major blah blah blah

    Fortunately you don't have to study poli sci to understand this. I've decided to make a thread because this is in every thread right now. Think of it as a public service announcement.

    "It really grinds my gears that people care about the presidential election more than the house and senate elections."

    K g8 thnks 4 ur input

    But here's why that's the case. The presidency is a national office. Everyone gets to vote on our next candidate. The house and Senate elections are state elections. Tonight my favorite Senator, Scott Brown, lost to a die hard Democrat. This is a massive loss for bi-partisanship in the Senate. Now, why don't people care? Because no one besides Massachusetts...ians are able to vote on who represents Massachusetts in the Senate except for Massachusettsians Massholes.

    Please just accept this and stop posting about how righteously furious you are over the inordinate weight being placed on the Presidential elections over the Senatorial and House elections.

    Shpanks.

  2. #2
    The nicest spammer TripMyHop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Norcal (I'm back!)
    Posts
    9,248
    I cared about the Mass senate race, as well as a host of others.

    But people could at least focus on their own.





  3. #3
    ♠Class 'A' Offender♠ ♠Ace♠'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Last Home of Class.
    Posts
    15,449
    Quote Originally Posted by Foxes View Post
    Hi I'm a political science major blah blah blah

    Fortunately you don't have to study poli sci to understand this. I've decided to make a thread because this is in every thread right now. Think of it as a public service announcement.

    "It really grinds my gears that people care about the presidential election more than the house and senate elections."

    K g8 thnks 4 ur input

    But here's why that's the case. The presidency is a national office. Everyone gets to vote on our next candidate. The house and Senate elections are state elections. Tonight my favorite Senator, Scott Brown, lost to a die hard Democrat. This is a massive loss for bi-partisanship in the Senate. Now, why don't people care? Because no one besides Massachusetts...ians are able to vote on who represents Massachusetts in the Senate except for Massachusettsians Massholes.

    Please just accept this and stop posting about how righteously furious you are over the inordinate weight being placed on the Presidential elections over the Senatorial and House elections.

    Shpanks.
    Umm...duh?

    The president is the single person who is meant to represent society as a whole. This is why we have these National Elections. Anybody who can't figure that out for themselves is a complete moron.

    Quote Originally Posted by Hank View Post
    Ace is the best storyteller I've ever met in my entire life. Come listen.



  4. #4
    SupidFox <3 Foxes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,368
    Quote Originally Posted by TripMyHop View Post
    I cared about the Mass senate race, as well as a host of others.

    But people could at least focus on their own.
    I really could expand on this OP, actually.

    I'm going to sleep in a minute, but here's the thing. People like big things, national things. People also are lukewarm about voting. The presidency is a national thing, and garners roughly 50% of registered voters. State elections are... 30 or 40%? I'm paraphrasing from this book on the Federal System. Municipal elections garner about 20%.

    This is more an attack on the people saying "I dun geddit" and implicitly encouraging them to say "Oh, okay. Now how do we change this?"

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by ♠Ace♠ View Post
    Umm...duh?

    The president is the single person who is meant to represent society as a whole. This is why we have these National Elections. Anybody who can't figure that out for themselves is a complete moron.
    If I remember right there were a couple of people saying "I hope New York/[insert Democratic stronghold] goes for Obama" in the electoral thread. So yes, Ace, we have some morons on this site. Let us embrace and uplift them.

  5. #5
    ♠Class 'A' Offender♠ ♠Ace♠'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Last Home of Class.
    Posts
    15,449
    The electoral college is all that really matter, anyway.

    Quote Originally Posted by Hank View Post
    Ace is the best storyteller I've ever met in my entire life. Come listen.



  6. #6
    The nicest spammer TripMyHop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Norcal (I'm back!)
    Posts
    9,248
    Quote Originally Posted by Foxes View Post
    I really could expand on this OP, actually.

    I'm going to sleep in a minute, but here's the thing. People like big things, national things. People also are lukewarm about voting. The presidency is a national thing, and garners roughly 50% of registered voters. State elections are... 30 or 40%? I'm paraphrasing from this book on the Federal System. Municipal elections garner about 20%.

    This is more an attack on the people saying "I dun geddit" and implicitly encouraging them to say "Oh, okay. Now how do we change this?"

    - - - Updated - - -



    If I remember right there were a couple of people saying "I hope New York/[insert Democratic stronghold] goes for Obama" in the electoral thread. So yes, Ace, we have some morons on this site. Let us embrace and uplift them.
    Oh.

    I get it. It annoys me, but I get it.





Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •