Its not the length but the impact...![]()
The writer who cares more about words than about characters, action, setting, and atmosphere is unlikely to create a vivid and continuous dream; he gets in his own way too much; in his poetic drunkenness, he can't tell the cart- and its cargo- from the horse.
-John Gardner
"Grieve not, wise warrior. It is better
to avenge one's friend than mourn too much.
Each of us must one day reach the end
Of worldly life, let him who can win
glory before he dies: that lives on
after him, when he lifeless lies."
I had expected more from you Khan but you failed to live up to expectations...you came up short. You simply didn't measure up. Clearly your idea of length and the rest of the world is inches apart. If you had a modicum of skill I might have forgiven your short comings...
The writer who cares more about words than about characters, action, setting, and atmosphere is unlikely to create a vivid and continuous dream; he gets in his own way too much; in his poetic drunkenness, he can't tell the cart- and its cargo- from the horse.
-John Gardner
"Grieve not, wise warrior. It is better
to avenge one's friend than mourn too much.
Each of us must one day reach the end
Of worldly life, let him who can win
glory before he dies: that lives on
after him, when he lifeless lies."
Again you come back with flaccid-short replies...so sad, so sad...
The writer who cares more about words than about characters, action, setting, and atmosphere is unlikely to create a vivid and continuous dream; he gets in his own way too much; in his poetic drunkenness, he can't tell the cart- and its cargo- from the horse.
-John Gardner
"Grieve not, wise warrior. It is better
to avenge one's friend than mourn too much.
Each of us must one day reach the end
Of worldly life, let him who can win
glory before he dies: that lives on
after him, when he lifeless lies."
You bitches! Now i gotta catch in here and the IC -.-
In which case Cheshire or Fananatu would have decided he knew too much of this whole plot (Knowing Fan is plotting against Eclava and working with the rebels) and would have killed him once he was a bit away from the group. It is probably just better to say the necromancer killed him, then we can have a zombie tank.
I'll probably post some time today. In the fight Cheshire will probably be away from the rest of the party so that they don't interfere with his tp abilities, so unless you were planning on including him in your posts it shouldn't interrupt anything anyone had going
Shhhhh, sweet children...
Well if Rilla gives us a zombie minotaur I am down with that but I won't count on it...but in Valgar...
The writer who cares more about words than about characters, action, setting, and atmosphere is unlikely to create a vivid and continuous dream; he gets in his own way too much; in his poetic drunkenness, he can't tell the cart- and its cargo- from the horse.
-John Gardner
"Grieve not, wise warrior. It is better
to avenge one's friend than mourn too much.
Each of us must one day reach the end
Of worldly life, let him who can win
glory before he dies: that lives on
after him, when he lifeless lies."
You're not getting a zombie minotaur. Far as we know, he just left somewhere to do some deep, down masturbation then got left.
I just saw your signature. I'm your homie? <3
Why do you ask what, when the delicious question is when?