Reply With QuoteI just want to know if being physically trained is singular to non-hybrid rogues and warriors?
Would hackers and trappers count as rogue subclasses if we were to expand beyond fantasy genre?
What other non-hybrid rogues aren't physically adept?
Is physical adeptness singular to rogues and warriors? If we're talking about the 4 base classes clerics, mages, rogues, warriors.
If not, is there anything that is singular to rogues and warriors and common to both?
I just want to know if being physically trained is singular to non-hybrid rogues and warriors?
I'm just going to report this as spam.
The most obvious difference between rogues and warriors is the reliance on stealth, which the rogue does a lot and the warrior not at all.
But not sure if serious.
what
I was asking about similarities.... Differences are obvious.
I just want to know if being physically trained is singular to non-hybrid rogues and warriors?
http://roleplayerguild.com/showthrea...al-video-gamesOriginally Posted by Hank
You tell me.
- - - Updated - - -
Go to post #18. Basically sums this guy up.
He's made three threads since he joined in September, all of them repeating the same question. And also if chemistry can be applied to understanding RPG classes.
I just want to know if being physically trained is singular to non-hybrid rogues and warriors?
It was physics.
You've repeated that question three - maybe four - times now. Nobody's answered yet because WE DON'T FUCKING KNOW WHAT YOU MEAN.
All I'm doing is trying to find some fundamental similarities between rogues warriors and rangers.
Can we change the topic of this thread to Spiderman?
Posting Permissions
