Sexual roleplays

[Dudel]

]So you thought I was advocating it shouldn't be against the rules, or at least looked to correct me somewhere by saying the reason why it should stay. The thing is I never said or even implied it shouldn't. The point about it in the rules had been made already multiple times and I never called it into question. Only later, after I pointed out your misunderstanding, did you start calling it irrelevant to cover up your own mistake in comprehension.

Call me crazy for trying to discuss something in the Roleplaying Discussion board.

As I said to someone elsewhere: There was nothing to discuss.

The reason for sex being taboo and unwanted in the public eye (be that due to social stigma, religion or simply because sex is gross) had no importance on the thread at all.

"No one wants to see it."

Responded with

"Actually......"

Shouldn't have happened unless you were, yourself, trying to derail the thread. The person's comment which you responded didn't even need responding. (Unless, again, trying to derail)

The issue, is indeed, the fact that it isn't allowed on site and there doesn't need to be a discussion as to why it is or is not accepted elsewhere.

But, again, I'm perfectly okay with derailing the crud out of this thread should you wish to continue.

---------- Post added at 01:38 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:38 AM ----------

I said it should be handled carefully and realistically, just as other things that could be major influences in people's lives. Nobody's challenged that as far as I can tell.

Here.

"No is easier and causes less confusion when asked what is and isn't allowed/okay/careful/realistic/etc."

Done.

[Sora]

How do you derail a derailed thread?

[Dudel]

How do you derail a derailed thread?

Add more track, of course.

[Hightower March]

The reason for sex being taboo and unwanted in the public eye (be that due to social stigma, religion or simply because sex is gross) had no importance on the thread at all.

You keep acting like that was my entire point. Check my previous post.

[Sole]

I said it should be handled carefully and realistically , just as other things that could be major influences in people's lives. Nobody's challenged that as far as I can tell.

Last I checked we were on the Internet, Mr. Smarty Pants. The Internet is practically imagination land, so you won't find realism here.

I really think this needs to be closed.

[Hightower March]

"No is easier and causes less confusion when asked what is and isn't allowed/okay/careful/realistic/etc."

Done.

So my post was relevant. It just wasn't "easy?" Cool.

---------- Post added at 12:42 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:41 AM ----------

By "realistically" I meant its importance shouldn't be undermined. Sorry if that was unclear.

[Sole]

Yea, and this is the Internet. Importance is obtained if it is important, however you mention something that is already delt with accordingly.

[Dudel]

So my post was relevant. It just wasn't "easy?" Cool.

Yes. No is a lot easier than specifically trying to detail what sexual elements can and can not be exposed to minors. I mean, not like anyone could disagree for any reason and start a bunch of trouble.

That's right, you picked the hard way and couldn't figure out why everyone thought the post was ultimately irrelevant to the thread.

Congratz. You win a duck.

[Sole]

[Gat]

and with that...