Alright, there is no need to get defensive. You purposed and idea, someone else disliked it and I as the coordinator of this stated that the specific standard you use for tournament and arena play isn't quite what we're looking for here. I wasn't ostracizing you. I wasn't berating you. But, it's my job to actually state things as to progress group endeavor. We will get nowhere if every time someone presents something and it does pan out, they become defensive. 

What I went out to explain is that there is a category system I set forth earlier and that there might be an in-character ranking system set by objectives made by an in character organization, but not an OOC one. That's all. I also showed an example of the methods I would use to attempt to "equate" and "balance" two characters if we required a numerical or tiered system, but we don't.

You're right. I asked for suggestions. I'm glad you provided them, but I assure you that no one was ostracizing you for your suggestion. It's just not ideal for what we're doing at this time.