[quote=@rextremendum]
A planetary defense cannon is f*cking retarded, when you can have man-portable anti-orbit weapons that fire nuclear-tipped warheads from the roof of buildings to keep low orbit clear of hostiles. Instead, your nation decided to spend a trillion billion dollars on worthless anti-ship tanks that will miss a retarded % of the time, because of the lack of course correction.

Also, good luck shooting lasers underwater. That'll go well.

The f*ck do those tubes go to on the shotgun? They're not even direct impingement, they're just bullshit.
[/quote]

1: the planetary defense cannons are made in case something gets past the orbital defense cannons, also, they don't have hand held nuclear-tipped warhead launchers, on that not nukes in atmosphere are bad, you know radiation and what not. =3

2: it's their money they's gonna spend it how they want it X3 and they have super computing A.I.'s for the anti-ship tanks for course correction =3

3: ... lasers don't work under water? I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't, after all the only example I have of lasers working under water is from starwars XD

4: they just there because meh, they make it look different =3

*edit

[quote=@rextremendum]
Why is your artillery piece so f*cking massive when you could get the gun on a car-pulled trailer and move it around for a trillion dollars left.

JESUS CHRIST 80MM MINIGUNS? that is f*cking deafening! It is a f*cking sound weapon at that point, and if those f*cking beasts can stand upright while shooting them, I don't even want to f*cking KNOW how strong they are.
[/quote]
 
1: having it on a car pulled trailer would cost less, but there are big animals on alien worlds that can rush a small car with an artillery trailer and crush it..

2: .... really big animals X3