My IC posts have not been edited after the fact. That much you can see. Neither have my PMs been edited after the fact. OOC posts were edited in response to your own edits, and no essential information has been removed from them.

I took your action and decided to use it in a different way, instead of asking you to retract it. I didn't expect you to charge at the mage, and my first reaction was 'this isn't allowed'. Which is when I caught myself on the fact that that would be railroading. So I wondered why you'd attack the mage (seems obvious), and thought 'what the hell, lets see what comes out of this!' by using your action to have Reverin antagonize Relius. Giving you a reason to dislike the mage would make for some great banter later on. All it would have taken from you is to say 'I'd rather edit my post instead if you *really* didn't agree with me.' Not the rage that has been spilled here, before and after my apologies about not being clear enough.

What's wrong with simply going along with the situation? You've been knocked back from the fence, unharmed from the wards, and can continue to the fight or find a new way to attack Reverin if that's really what you want to do. Why do you want to force that you are correct? You are. I made a mistake by not being clear enough, but instead of retracting it completely I decided to make something of it.

>It's not ignoring, it's refutting that your character has not moved from that last post. Which I pressumed was true because, you did not state othetwise. 

I also didn't state he moved beyond the fence, so why presume he did?

And the fact that we are having this conversation instead of me resorting to worse measures should be proof enough that I am not ignoring your opinion.	

EDIT: Spelling.