[@Aeonumbra]

Again, oh well. It wasn't intended to be practical. It was never intended to be practical. It was a [i]facet of her character.[/i] Schatz is lewd. She's a lewd person. The first line in her bio sums up her loves in life and one of them is [i]sex[/i], so yeah, she's gonna look like that. That's not saying she'll be super lewd or that sex'll even happen just because she's there, but she's certainly a lot more sexually liberal. Treading the line of 'dangerous' is her thing.

Great Attractor is totally removed from actual magnetism and is far more facile than I think you're reading it. The 'field' of applied magnetism is entirely different from a magnetic field; it's an area around an object where the effect of Great Attractor can come into play. Within that field, objects become magnetic.

I'll throw the explanation into a subset of Ohmosexual.


Rocket as in the back end, not the full thing. They're not magnetic on their own, but the casing sometimes is. I will, however, provide a full summation of what Chutney is.

There is no 'must' with writing. Writing is not made of quantifications. Your [i]setting[/i], however, does have a realistic limit and I don't have enough lore nor a broad understanding of where that limit lies. You've even stated that I don't have the knowledge necessary to suggest the level of realism.

The magnetic field itself is pretty small and can be nullified through conscious effort, given Schatz's abilities center around magnetism. 


Way to strip context from what I was saying with those selective quotes, though. That's a rhetorical fallacy. It's more necessity than it is personal taste, but personal taste still plays a big part. I say a lot of things similar to this in the bio, like why she doesn't opt for [i]at least a skirt.[/i] She's gonna push the envelope, again. It's who she is. 

I don't design things for the sake of design. I design them because it's in line with the character.