[@clericbeast] Interpretation, yes. Also, I understand the confliction with the "tone". We'll see how it plays out in the written portion.


[@Shotgun Bear] 

I didn't strip context from anything, that was a direct quote. Also, I did state that I understood personal style was a part, yes, but that is what you wrote, and I merely quoted it. Moving on. The fact that it was never intended to be practical really just tells me it's lewdness for lewdness sake because the character is kinky naughty hyper anime girl and we don't have to follow the laws of the world because there are things we don't understand like no moon and Aeon is sometimes lax on certain things.

[Post-pre edit] I apologize, that probably came off really rude, but really that's just me explaining how I feel and not mocking you, I promise.

So it's a hammer, with a road tire for the blunt end, riddled with road spikes, an engine and a fuel contraption, rocket (propulsion?) , with a car battery, with a convenient chainsaw ignition pull system.... ufukinwotm8? That's kind of excessively over the top and I still wonder how such a thing is effectively wielded, it feels very "anime". Your entire character feels very "Anime".
[quote=@Shotgun Bear]
"...Beyond all [u]rational probability[/u]..." 
[/quote]

No, I did not say you did not have enough lore to suggest the level of realism-- That's incredibly blind of you. You have six characters you could read up on for reference and six pieces of history to read. If that does NOT convey the sense of realism that this setting it built around then you are probably in the wrong place. No, what I said was you [u][b]Do not understand enough about my world to criticize my lore in an attempt to assuage my thoughts on your character[/b][/u], that is the sense I was conveying. The, "but Aeon there's no moon, so why can't I-"

Do not try to use unexplained lore against me, you are likely to lose every time. I don't always do things because they are "cool", most of the time there is a deeper reason & meaning, or perhaps something personal for me in it. There is a 'must' with writing, especially with other people, for me-- we can agree to disagree on that.

[hider=I had to look up facile, here's the def.]
fac·ile
ˈfasəl/Submit
adjective
1.
(especially of a theory or argument) appearing neat and comprehensive only by ignoring the true complexities of an issue; superficial.
synonyms:	simplistic, superficial, oversimplified; More
2.
(of success, especially in sports) easily achieved; effortless.
"a facile victory"
synonyms:	effortless, easy, undemanding, unexacting, painless, trouble-free
"he achieved a facile victory"
[/hider]

Now are you telling me to ignore the true complexities of it? Or that it is easily achieved. The latter doesn't quite fit, so I'm going to assume the former. However, it would have been much easier to simply explain it, because I admit I did not quite understand it, rather than word it the way you did, albeit I do not know your natural speech, so I am not accusing you of anything. What that really boils down into is "using magnetic objects to define the borders of a magnetic field in which anything inside is magnetized-- such as gas vapors".

Is my loose, simple interpretation of that correct?