[@MelonHead]

Funny you should be talking about burden of truth. You've got a lot more to account for than I do, not that you'll believe me when I say that. You just keep tossing the same baloney over and over, and I am refusing to play your game by repeating myself. You calmly explained and I calmly debunked. 
Imagine having a telescope. Say you took it outside and gave the top part just above the lens a hard blow with a brick. Yes, I know the difference in toughness. What is a telescope compared to a mech? Just like how a dude with a brick is incomparable to a six-hundred and fifty pound eldritch beast with a chunk of basalt the size of your head.

It's only a poor attack in your opinion. I say it's a good one, and that is where we truly differ in this argument. Funny thing that you should be talking about my character not taking much damage though, considering yours hasn't been so much as scratched. Yeah, I know. Not your fault, not your problem.

You haven't read my proposal yet? Go back and check my post where I point out all the instances of circular reasoning. It's at the bottom. 

As for the trusty old Judge's Decision victory, I could roll with that. After you see my proposal we'll decide on either a judge or a mutual agreement.