I would not say I've come undone at all! If were honestly labeling a prep as simply 'mentioning something in one post and then bringing it up in another' then would my diamond barrier not too be prepped?  I'm not trying to grasp at straws but this is a serious question. Dazsos' prep is nothing but 'writing it down' and then letting it off. It just seems convenient that this would constitute a prep and mine wouldn't. I will take some damage if necessary. Corban lost a testicle before, so this wouldn't be the worst thing to happen to him. But id like to hear a sensible answer to my question first.

Edit: Dazsos, how many times have I expounded on his evocation ability now? I sent you the entire list of evocation spells from d&d. I fail to see how that is still even being brought up.

Melon, expounding upon earlier, did Dazsos not do the [i]exact same thing[/i] to my railgun? I had a prepped attack moving probably [i]faster[/i] than this one, and he took little more than 'mild bruising'. I hope you'd understand why I'm so hesitant to roll over and adhere to these rules that only seem to apply when they inconvenience him. I feel I put more than enough thought into my defense, after having let so much slide, to facilitate some give and take of my own.