[@Dracogenius] Hmm...Okay, starting off I suppose I will write for my character's and the NPC's interaction, since my character is in involved...My second post was going to be between Erebus and Eros back in the kingdom anyhow. Forgive me, I read your post last night, and must of not seen that part. I just tried skimming them over once again, but still didn't find a mention of my character. But I do have advice, IF someone mentions another character in their post, could they please use @mention, at the very top of their post, so it's not as easy to miss entirely...Especially considering that particular 'reply' rule. Which I have to ask...

[quote=@Wisp]
We'd like to see everyone post at least once by the end of the week, but that's all! (so when this was posted, you have 4 days.)
[/quote]
[quote=@Dracogenius]
That means that if it is your turn to respond, you have four days to do so before you are skipped over.
[/quote]

Okay, not trying to make anything out of it, but doubling down (mentioning twice, nearly in a row.) of telling people to post quickly, or else. Might be a little silly if you made others wait around slightly longer than that. :P Once probably would of been enough, if you had to bring it up at all. :3

But question around that particular rule, what exactly does that mean? Does it mean if one replies you MUST get back to them in 4 days, no matter what? How exactly would that work if two characters were battling against each other? Can those two be posting literally pages before anyone else. And someone else hadn't posted for 5 days, but he hadn't been prompted so it doesn't matter? Usually I prefer, giving everyone a chance to post relatively evenly. If people over post, it can discourage people that feel that they are behind. Also skipped over how? So let's say if, two characters are having a conversation, if one doesn't post in a while, does the other person just ret-con the conversation? What happens if they come back to the RP after those 4 days? What do they post now that there last post has been ret-conned?

Because the way I have done role-plays in my highschool RP forum, when I had concern about inactive players, or simply active players needing to take a sudden leave of absence. I'd called them 'seamless RP's'. Which what that meant was, anyone's character that was inactive for a long period of time, or if someone said they'd be gone for several days. The 'GM' or someone else with the person's permission would simply 'control' their character's actions until further notice. This was to make the roleplay more natural and not have less active posters ruin the flow of the narrative. Unfortunately I haven't seen this tatic used since then, so I guess it was just 'our thing'.

Though, yes getting 'skipped' if you're the last person to post, doesn't make a lot of sense, and I'm still not exactly sure what skipping implies. It helps when rules/lore of the RP are clearly defined, especially if they're strictly enforced. :P