[quote=@Sionnie]
<Snipped quote by VKAllen>

Sigh.. I give, You are arguing on Ethos only.. I am arguing on Ethos/Logos/Pathos.. There is no longer point in an argument if you refuse to use Logos.  and you do not understand the word Hypothetical. sorry. 
[/quote]

I believe you do not understand how such a hypothetical situation is hugely not in your favour. You cannot simply state a hypothetical situation when a person already has a set of moral codes that they would not break. [b][color=ed1c24]Simply stating that if they hypothetically broke that rule, then they in this hypothetical situation were never lawful good.[/color][/b] The fact that Galawayn is lawful good invalidates that situation. This is not just ethos, this is ethos, logos and pathos.

Ethos: Alignment
Logos: Action depending on alignment
Pathos: Consequence of Action.