[quote=@ASTA] The modern field of nanomedicine has been moderately successful at employing nanotechnology in the treatment of certain forms of cancer (photodynamic therapy is one such nanotechnological method of isolating a tumor and subsequently destroying it, and has been shown to be a superior option to the traditional mode of cancer treatment: chemotherapy), drug delivery (less collateral damage to the body due to the drug being spread about everywhere instead of being precisely directed at one specific locale), and blood purification. I'd go digging around for research papers for you to take a gander at, but I'm really short on time at the moment, so I hope that these two Wikipedia articles will suffice: [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanorobotics#Nanomedicine] [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanomedicine] Not interested in crawling through those two bowls of word soup? Then think of the issue at hand in this particular way: before the advent of the airplane, the wingsuit, or the glider, mankind could only watch aimlessly as birds soared about in the sky. A substantial number of traditionally biological features (such as memory, eyesight, or bipedal locomotion) have been adequately mimicked--and in many cases even ameliorated dramatically--by both modern and archaic machines. Why would the immune system be impossible to mechanically replicate? It doesn't make a lot of sense based off of what we've witnessed occurring over the course of the last 6,000 years or so of human civilization. Remember: it was only roughly 200 years ago (about ten human generations) that the industrial revolution was the height of human technological prowess. But I don't know. I'm not really sure about this RP anymore. Too many inconsistencies and personal bias for me to remain interested. [/quote] I am sorry, I tried to be nice about this and I really am sorry that you may have lost interest. The fact of the matter is we cannot and will not allow this. The only reason is for balancing issues, if we had this a hella lot more lenient we would let you. However, even after I tired to compromise with you, you still argue and refuse to accept the notion that we here are wanting balance! That is the key to a roleplaying game! In a game have you gone against a character so high level that you died no matter what? That would be poor balancing! I am not going to debate on this any longer. We will not allow this for a starting nation no matter what you say, if you cannot accept it then please, complain to my farm. The field of fucks that is currently barren. Now, if you excuse me, I will be going to calm myself with a nice warm bubble bath. If you wish to stay, please come up with a different idea.