[@Vilageidiotx] First paragraph isn't needed because I didn't argue that. Though we don't really need reform for the post office, we already have something better. Emails are a much better/simple/faster way for sending information now. Things CAN become obsolete, and there's nothing wrong with that.

Second one, doesn't have much to do with my statement either. Because it literally can't. (Which is my point.) But I'll just say the idea in my opinion, it has plenty of problems on its own. But I won't get into it too deeply, because honestly I don't personally have a better/detailed alternative. And I agree that there is a problem in the first place. But I'm almost certain this has come up before...

But whether or not you agree with the general concept (socialized medicine = beneficial), is beside the point. The thing I argued against, was using some of the worst and least useful, most over budgeted government programs implying all of them were good. (and congress...which apparently is the same thing.) to somehow very weakly connected all of time, to 'why the government should socialize medicine.' 

FCC censors good + Bankrupt/In Debt Programs unrelated to medicine + You didn't build that = Get more government in medicine?!? 

That just baffles the shit out of me.