[@Zeroth][@Krayzikk]

I analyzed the two CSes in question and I think that they are actually very different. Here's my general analysis:

1.	The general weakness Matsuri deals with is the stop. She has listed limits of durability, turning and environment (the general is moving faster and is harder to react limitation) whereas Kazu’s are: Speed limit (she can only go as fast as she can safely move without hurting herself), Breakdown – her muscles and bones with fracture and tear the more she uses her quirk, durability, and her inability to control how fast she is going when dropping her weights.

2.	Breakdown of differences: One of Kazu’s strengths is actually one of Matsuri’s weaknesses. Kazu is able to process stimuli far faster than non-speedsters where this is one of Matsuri’s largest weaknesses. 

3.	Kazu uses weights for extreme resistance when she is running and a way to ‘break her limit’ by taking them off. This is a key difference to how Matsuri functions mainly due to the fact that Matsuri is more focused on a burst of speed whereas Kazu is focused on maintaining a slower more constant speed, thus the need to process stimuli faster and weight to keep her going slower (on a super speed level of course). 

4.	Matsuri’s techniques mainly revolve around using her quirk in order to perform a superhuman attack. This is very different from any of Kazu’s skills in which she typically speaking uses normal movements that are greatly enhanced [i]because[/i] she is moving at super speed. Kazu also has fewer named moves and is more focused, once more, on her consistency as a speedster instead of a one powerful shot archetype that Matsuri clearly falls under.

5.	Both go into great detail about how their quirk can get them into trouble, however Matsuri seems to be unable to be ripped apart [i]simply[/i] by her own speed and strength. Whereas this is a constant wall that Kazu has in front of her. This may not seem important, but it allows them to write how they are using their abilities very differently, it also allows them to specify in complete different strengths and overall have very varied writing.

All in all, while yes they are both speedsters – the way they use their abilities are completely different, as are 95% of their strengths, weaknesses, skills and techniques. I’d argue they’re very different under analysis as too will be their writing in application. Personally, I know we're getting a ton of applications so I think two very different uses of super speed isn't the worst offence, given the fact that it's such an incredibly popular power/quirk and I would hate for either writer to have to go back and edit their entire CS.