[@KoL] I was using Fermi estimation to get ideas of the scales of the different forces in comparison to each other. I made a lot of errors because Fermi estimation is basically "don't sweat the details." So, let's begin the true math off, and begin our physics contest in earnest.

1. You're right, I goofed in the first part, mistook momentum and force there for a bit, and made another error noted below. The number I actually wanted was actually a little higher than your result, which would be 30,000 kg * 9.9 m/s (which is what the velocity would be after 7 meter jump, I accidentally used average velocity instead of velocity). Made a difference of a factor of about x2, which is within Fermi estimation error range. However, it fortunately matches up with gravity's acceleration pretty well, so we can use your result just fine without meaningful difference.

2. I'll defer to your expertise, I didn't get to Pascals much in my college physics. Mind doing the calculations for 132 teranewtons of force and a 160 mm^2 area? However, if I understand correctly, this is a case where the effective force scales inversely with the square of the area. A 160 mm^2 area will have 160^2 less force per square meter than a 1 mm^2 area. So, 25,600 times less force. I had assumed my sword was a x10 multiplier, but I'll change it to a x25,600 multiplier! If I'm wrong, it's probably a x160 modifier, yeah?

3. You made my earlier momentum = force error here! I also made this error and some general other stupidity! Instead, if we want to do this right, we have to bring Impulse into the equation. Specifically this equation. Impulse = Force * Time = Change in Momentum. Your time, by your definition is .00001 seconds. Since we want to go from our current speed to zero, the change in momentum is the momentum!  Sooo, doot do doot. Momentum = 44 m/s * 30,000 kg = Force (unknown) * .00001 seconds. Which gives us Force = 132,000,000,000 kg*m/s^2. Which is 1000 times my calculation and 100,000 times yours! We're dealing in "tera" prefix things again, and the power of Juno again is in the Miyu would need a four order of magnitude power up to be in the same playing field. We take my earlier result of 66 Miyu units, halve for my average/end velocity goof before, 33, and then multiply it by 1000 to get 33,000 Miyu units. Oh, then multiply by 10 for Juno/Jorm again to get 330,000 Miyu units (because before I only did that for the nuke calc). Can I hear 5 orders of magnitude? Also, remember this is a situation where Juno hardly considered this an attack and was surprised Miyu suffered damage. But wait! My multiplier on the Miyu unit from sword effectiveness is changing to 25,600! I already applied a x10, so we'll divide 330,000 by 2,560 and get: 12.8! Miyu's attack is 12.8 times less for the same amount of area. While Jorm's attack did do severe damage, it did so by blunt force and acceleration. It didn't tear through Henry like a sword blade. Thus, Miyu's blade wouldn't penetrate his skin, even if it did have another 12.8 times relative force (for example, if you say Jorm form actually only increases say, 10% instead of something more significant). And because the blunt force is lower by a factor of 3,300,000 (taking away the original x10 modifier to the Miyu unit), Henry is going to be mildly nonplussed at how the blade bounces off him. And again, this is all entirely assuming an attack that Juno didn't consider an attack and was surprised Miyu took damage from, was Juno's best effort.

4. You directly equated newtons to joules. This is a no no. You also moved the decimal place wrong. Also "her goal being to bisect the machine piloted by the traitor angel with a single swing that carried behind it the energy of one of the nukes Miyu had just dropped over her own allies." So, yeaaaah. You did not write "a perfectly reasonable energy given Juno's mass and speed." I was assuming Juno has magical powers augmenting her attacks. Granted, given how her speed appears to be teleportation to us, I wouldn't be surprised if her actual speed was 28,284 m/s.