[quote=@SillyPhilly]
#1: Because of your fusion monster's name clause you can't actually make it since you can only run a max. of 3 of each card in a deck. This can be solved with just havin it treated at Tyrant Dragon while on the field or in the grave.[/quote]

This has been addressed like twice already. You don't need to say it again.

[quote]#2:It's "attack again" effect is kind of busted. Change it to "attack another monster once again in a row" and put a once per turn clause on it.[/quote]

It's really not that big a deal. I might think about it, but for now I'm okay unless someone can make a good case for it not only for me but Mr. Dragonmancer.

[quote]#3:Tail Spear just doesn't work. For one you can't tribute summon from the graveyard. [/quote]

The wording was a little confusing, but it doesn't say tribute from the graveyard, it says to the graveyard.

[quote]#4. It's activation requires you to have no monsters but then it wants you to tribute monsters from both the field and hand. If you need to have an open field to use it then why have the option to tribute from the field? [/quote]

Again, bad wording. He's apparently doing an errata of it so that he tributes from the hand. I think he should say "special summon" instead of "tribute summon" too. I'm also pondering whether or not to change "tribute" to "send from hand to graveyard" so he can't exploit Hieratics.

[quote]#5: 1000 atk is kind of big, especially for a revival equip. Remove this.[/quote]

Axe of Despair OP komoney pls nerf

[quote]#6: The wordin youre lookin for is "if the equipped monster would be destroyed, destroy this card instead."[/quote]

He knows.

[quote]#7: Not quite sure why it needs to be treated as a Tyrant Dragon spell when it already has Tyrant Dragon in the name.[/quote]

See above.

[quote]#8: What do you mean "tributed from the graveyard"? Don't you mean banished?[/quote]

Djinns are "tributed" from the graveyard.

[quote]#9: It's effect that makes it attack again should require the destroyed monster to be sent to the graveyard.[/quote]

Maybe, but it's not like he can just randomly tech Dark Law into the deck so it's not like that'll even matter. Again a problem of wording, which has been addressed.

[quote]#10: Once again, since this has a name clause you can't more than 3 of it. You are currently runnin' 6 Tyrant Dragons.[/quote]

The horse has been dead for hours, yet you still continue to beat it. Why?

[quote]#11: A card that is unaffected by traps AND can attack multiple times AND is a casual plus 1 as soon as it comes out seems terribly broken. Pick 2 and scrap the third.[/quote]

Supreme Tyrant Dragon requires three specific monster either on board or in the grave and a fourth card to fuse them all. As opposed to Kozmo shups or BECMD which are stronger and need less to summon.

Also please GM your own game. This one's mine's.