@Blueflame

Alright then. I mean, there's nothing stopping people from waiting until the deadline gets close - especially since, like I said, there's strategies that can be implemented around it (gotta love psychological warfare) - but I'm planning to make an active attempt to ensure that this deadline is maintained.

@Shoryu Magamikk

am I allowed to change my vote if i want to, or is it locked in?

am I allowed to change my vote if i want to, or is it locked in?

Generally speaking, once you officially point the finger you're done. That's how it's explained in the rules in the opening post. I'm only guessing the game usually operates under those rules, but if it doesn't then someone should let me know and I'll change it from the next game onward.

Verdict:

@carla6677 - 4 Votes (eliminated by majority vote)
@Briza - 2 Votes

@Luna_Maria has been eliminated by the murderer.

Those remaining in the game are @NekoMizu, @Blueflame, @Mae, @Pudding, and @Briza.

Let's do this.

@Shoryu Magami
I beleive you lock in your vote once you @Accuse someone.

@Shoryu Magami reserve spot next game
The first time I am not in the last round when I played

@Pudding

Cheers for that. I really haven't played it in person in over a decade, so I forget. I've always used the 'can't take back vote' rule online.

@carla6677

You're now reserved, alongside @Kalleth if they want the spot.

Any know who was the most quietest so far?

@Blueflame, @NekoMizu hath been rather silent amongst the living. What is your prerogative for asking?

@Brizathat could possible reason to belive they may be the murderer but only a possiblility

@Blueflame, paranoia intensification.
_{I am secretly suspicious of Mae.}

@Brizawhy do you have a secret suspision of them?

@Blueflame, the quickness to jump on the bandwagon into persecuting the Carla-player. Perhaps, Mae just wants to get on Briza's good side to appear innocent.

On a side note -- Do you think Carla6677 was innocent? Le nuttin' to see here.

@Briza

There's only one murderer, so @carla6677 had to be innocent. If the murderer was voted off, the game would be over.

Actually I just didn't appreciate the comment. I don't have anything so far, though I do find it interesting that Luna Maria was eliminated. I'm wondering why the killer chose them.

@Briza@Mae maybe it was just random to start but eventualy they may pick the people who get close to discovering them. And by your logic mae may think your guilty becuase your quickness to retaliate

*eats popcorn*

@Briza@Mae maybe it was just random to start but eventualy they may pick the people who get close to discovering them. And by your logic mae may think your guilty becuase your quickness to retaliate

@Blueflame I find it interesting that you are trying to direct my suspicions towards Briza. Either you suspect me or Briza or someone else or don't have an opinion, so why turn us against each other? I think it's perfectly logical for Briza to suspect me because I did go from not voting for someone to voting for carla on a whim.

Also your abstaining from the vote when Shoryu made several comments about the first round going to two kills if no vote was cast is interesting. Even if you were playing it safe and were sure that other people would vote, and didn't want to make an incorrect decision, it still looks iffy, particularly as he mentioned it several times and there is no benefit to the murderer killing twice.

I'm throwing my chips in and voting for @Blueflame.

On a side note, I don't think the victim choice is ever random, even if the murderer doesn't have a preference to who goes out, they are still influenced to their choice in some way, whether it be conscious decision or unconscious.

@Mae im not trying to dissmay anyones vote im just trying to use logic but having said that vote for whom ever you wish