[quote]I reject the notion that I must accept the vaguest of allegations in the absence of evidence in order to appease the Left. Show me specific, documented wrongdoing and I will condemn it. Until then, absolutely all of the Russia narrative is propaganda. That's not me being paranoid, that's how democratic politics (especially two-party politics) works -- it is all spin, all of it, all the time. Why are we talking about Russia instead of Saudi? Spin, and no other reason. Saudi's been "influencing" our elections, tangibly, directly, demonstrably, for decades -- and not just with memes, with hundreds of billions of actual real dollars. Why aren't we talking about that -- well, both parties are guilty as sin, so nobody can spin it to their favor. I mean Trump could, they were all in for Hilary, but the GOP itself takes their money all the time, so there's no calling-out. 
[/quote]
RT. And it's not to appease the left it's to make there less people on the left and thus it's for the betterment of mankind. I repeatedly made mention of various groups like saudis going for hilary so at this point you're not even strawmanning you're just spouting shit without reading what you're spouting in a response to. But "lol hilary did more" is a pretty ebin thing to say when I didn't disagree. 

[quote]Well that's starting to ramble. My point is -- no. I'm not playing a game with loaded dice. "Russian interference" is a meaningless term and I assign it no value whatsoever. Not. Playing. Along. 

Speaking of actual demonstrable wrongdoing, wanna look into ineligible votes? Election fraud? No? Then y'all can shut the fuck up about imaginary russians. 
[/quote]
Nice dude