[@Dynamo Frokane]

I have to beg the question as to why, if you would explain? 

As for the topic itself, I believe there is probably some validity to it, which I add only for the sake of not throwing the entire thing out. What I mean by this is while sapiosexuality is not at all prevalent to the degree that it is almost "commonplace", or at least this measurable, there probably are instances of it that could be traced back and read from documentation. I am not quite that invested in looking into it, however. It is neither impactful nor meaningful enough to be of concern beyond how it outwardly portrays itself, that being it usually comes off as an attempt to stand out. From my own experiences, I am biased against things that are not more traditional forms of sexuality, not because they are different, but because I seldom hold similar views to those who conscribe to them; it is better for both to just not conflict and thus far, in those cases where I investigated deeper, I have not yet been wrong to assess the mindsets and personas were incompatible.