[quote=@Webmaster] It really wasn't. You always go on about how bad your memory is. That was absolutely never the agreement. Your memory is failing you. No, there was a soft ban IC because it was established that there was literally no reason for anyone to be homosexual on an Existential scale. As for what you're going to "let me" do, you don't have the authority to do the exact thing you think you're trying to prevent me from doing. You've posted almost zero times in the past two to three years and you're trying to be the rule regulator, while I'm only enforcing the preexisting agreements that were already there. [/quote] It absolutely was. You also claim to have a near-photographic memory but you've forgotten as much as I do. It was. You can go fucking check. There's literally no reason to be [i]anything[/i] on an Existential scale. And it's not a matter of what authority I have, it's about your lack of it. I'm also the only one who actually followed the original rules consistantly. You're the one who threw out the "no religion" rule as soon as you got someone to support it with Whiz. You're trying to enforce a rule that isn't how you claim it is, which is exactly why we only had three to begin with.