[quote=@Webmaster]
<Snipped quote by Balance>

I have a different full stance but share the same sentiments.


[@DarkwolfX37]

1. Not my reasoning.
2. That was literally a discussion about you breaking the rules that already existed. You straight up broke the rule and tried to redefine it.
[/quote]

1. It's almost word for word what you gave as your reasoning at the time. I had to say the same "you know you can just have characters be neutral, right?" speech to you and you even responded "I guess I can do that but I'd rather you not put me in a situation where I'd have to."
2. You only established it as a "rule" after I left, which was after the character was made. It's a discussion of you not getting to ramrod your personal feelings into MR just because you had one person agree with you and another passively support you. Even not counting me, if you want to pull a democracy bullshit, you've got 2, maybe 3 votes against whereas I can easily pull 3-4 who don't care and would be fine with it.