Pepperm1nts said
Just my two cents.
I look at it this way. If Outcast lets it happen, I don't really care. It's his game, his rules. If somebody wants to contest something with him, I imagine they would do what any roleplayer would when they disagree with the GM and contact him in private about it. If Outcast changes it, cool. If he doesn't, it's just as good. It's perfectly acceptable, if not preferable in most cases to voice (constructive) criticism and try to make sure that the game stays at least somewhat realistic. The problem is when people start name-calling, rehashing old news, and causing trouble for the sake of causing trouble. Not only is it disruptive but it's also frustrating. If I post something, I'm totally cool with people telling me that they disagree with what I did or how I did it. However, it's an entirely different story when somebody throws a bitch fit because they don't like the way something is done.
A little civility goes a long way, and I don't know why some people think that they're too good to be nice to somebody. Which is where almost all of these arguments start, somebody starts getting condescending, drawing in people to argue for or against a particular thing.
Pasta Sentient said
Only popping up to state that no one should respond to Peppermint!s statement as it will only ignite more conflict as this time. This issue is over with.
Potentially, but it is what it is.
Rare said
He doesn't have to listen to you, you aren't the GM.^^
No, but he was trying to stop an argument before it broke out. I give him credit for that.