[OOC] New Dawn Rising

[Shorticus]

...You know, we really need someone to play a South American nation.

[AltRightHero]

<Snipped quote by AltRightHero>

They do, its just hard to see since Russia got nuked in the face till it turned to swiss cheese.

Speaking of which, why the fuck is there a giant ass hole in the middle of the Amazon?

Did someone hate the tree huggers enough to nuke the fucking rainforest?

@ClocktowerEchos

Well in that case (since I don't know if a situation like this has happened yet) have the demographics for any NPC state been said yet, or are you even allowed to declare NPC nations.
If Sigma could let me, I'd be fine with picking the Arab Republic of Northern Egypt, but if I did pick it, I'd have to change the name (and some of the possible existing lore)
Do you think the GM would let me?

Edit:

...You know, we really need someone to play a South American nation.

@Shorticus

I'd be fine with playing one, but it isn't my favorable area to play.

[Willy Vereb]

If I may ask, does the Holy Hungarian league own Moscow (I can't tell from a map of Russia and what territory he owns)

@AltRightHero

We only own East Europe till Ukraine and the Baltic states. Even then there are some gaps. I am the green on the map.
Novogrod Empire was effectively Russia during the Great War. They broke into multiple smaller nations after it.

[AltRightHero]

*Ignore*

[ClocktowerEchos]

<Snipped quote by ClocktowerEchos>

They had to nuke the Amazon. The hippies were hiding WMDs there

@Nerevarine

All natural nukes of peace, love, weed, equality, and thermo-nuclear global genocide it seems.
...
What if the if was the hippies who started the apocalypse?! :O

[ClocktowerEchos]

@SigmaI'm working on more of the IRJ's military and I need to ask, what's the general attitude towards mechs and walker-type vehicles?

Also, I'm thinking of just renaming Japan into Fuso since I'm so used to typing Fuso Q-Q

[Inkdrop]

Gonna do my second IC post since it looks like most have posted.

[Sigma]

@ClocktowerEchos Walkers and Mechs are all good with me :) Also you can move your sheet over to the characters section.

@AltRightHero We got room, have you made a final decision on what land are you interested in taking?

Did I miss anyone else?

[Monkeypants]

If it doesn't exist already, is there interest on forming a UN of sorts?

[Sigma]

It is an idea to consider, how does it sound to everyone else?

[Shorticus]

It... Eh? I mean, it's a neat idea, but I feel like it would be at least as ineffectual in this era as it is right now in real life. That is to say: very. Potentially more.

We have some diametrically opposed nations idealogically, too. Corporate nations, confederations, federations, communist nations, monarchies, imperial republics, NPC police states, etc. This isn't to mention the topic of mutants. If we put all those guys in a room together and ask 'em to play nice, that's an even worse situation than the real world U.N. has.

I'm not against the idea, but I want to emphasize once more: I think it'd be ineffectual. It could be fun to RP, but it ought to be ineffectual.

[Inkdrop]

@Shorticus Its going to be more like the League of Nations, really.

Can I go ahead and post again?

[Sigma]

@Inkdrop Nothing was holding you back :P

As said, there is no posting order.

[Shorticus]

Speaking of posting order... STILL planning on posting today, though I'm pretty worn out after working on stuff for another roleplay. I'll post again tonight, after I get home.

I'd have driven home several hours ago except I need to conduct a psychological experiment for class in about an hour and a half, and it takes an hour to drive there and roughly 1/3-1/4 a tank of gas to go one way. Hoorah.

[Sigma]

@Shorticus No worries and no rush, the rp can wait :)

[Monkeypants]

I didn't know the un was effective today :) but yes, a early league of nations rose from the ashes of the last great war. or some such.

[Shorticus]

I didn't know the un was effective today :) but yes, a early league of nations rose from the ashes of the last great war. or some such.

@Monkeypants

Ah, no. We have a misunderstanding. Ineffectual means "not effective."

[Monkeypants]

<Snipped quote by Monkeypants>

Ah, no. We have a misunderstanding. Ineffectual means "not effective."

@Shorticus

I know what it means lol..

[Shorticus]

Oh, my bad. DON'T MIND ME, I'm being a dork.

[Monkeypants]

I just really like the idea of having an IC where everyone is arguing about an event and absolutely nothing is being done about it.