Ace of Hearts

The Unpopular Opinions Thread.

@Ace of Hearts ... are you even serious at this point. You're strawmanning everyone at this point. He didn't say nazi's were not war criminals he said the Soviets were worse.

I just provided you with evidence that they were in fact worse.

Thank you for your time, now please fuck off to where ever you came from and learn how to argue a point with sources, rhetoric and logic rather than putting down a meme and going 'ha, trolé u'.

@Buddha

Come on.

You show me evidence Stalin was a big meanie.

I agree. Russia was fucking terrible.

I don't see how this doesn't make Nazis war criminals though.

Look, I know you were on the debate team in High School and you used some fancy ten dollar words to act like the Cool Detached Smart Guy, but if we're gonna break Godwin's Law here, I want to be on the "Nazis = war criminals" side.

That's just me though. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

The Unpopular Opinions Thread.

<Snipped quote by Ace of Hearts>

Believe it or not but Stalin has more kills to his name and was responsible for such great things as;

- Holodomor
- The Great Purge
- Order 227

and other war crimes.

I'm not sure if you know that. Now you know.

@Buddha

Yes, I familiar. I hear it all the time when other nazi apologists bring up the fact that "Hiter wasn't so bad guyz"

I still don't see how it justifies proclaiming that Nazis weren't war criminals. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

The Unpopular Opinions Thread.

Because Flat-Earthers aren't like...dangerous?

His exact wording was "Russians were the real war criminals, not the nazis" and buddy, if he doesn't think the mass oppression and murder of Rroma, Jewish, Gay and the disabled doesn't count as a warcrime, then he's fucked in the head.

Listen pal, I get it. You don't like drama. I don't like idiots. But you're more willing to have him here than me.

Pretty fucked up.

The Unpopular Opinions Thread.

So, are you saying you're fine with nazi apologists here?

The Unpopular Opinions Thread.

<Snipped quote by Ace of Hearts>

I dont give a shit what you have a tolerance for, This is not a debate thread.

The specific function of this thread is for people to share their, unpopular, offensive and yes, EDGY veiws without having to defend them from the mainstream. Now you have every right to bitch, but I didnt make this thread to welcome alt views just so we could have all out fish in a barrel to have a go at them. If you scroll through the pages there are no direct challenges or arguments even though we CLEARLY do not all agree with each other we understand the function of this thread.

Am I a Nazi Sympathiser? No

Do I find the views offensive and ignorant? Of course I do. But if I want to bitch about it, i'm going to go into the Bitchfest thread (thats what its there for) and complain about what I don't like In there where everyone is supposed to complain. I dont need you discouraging peoples outrageos views in here.

@Dynamo Frokane

The Unpopular Opinions Thread.

@Ace of Hearts if you're gonna strawman me, at least strawman me properly. I never said dogkins are ridiculous. People are out there with mental disorders that make them feel like they're dogs (or think that they are) and these people need help.

Furthermore I asked you a question. Where do you draw the line. If you wanna argue with me, then argue properly and answer me, otherwise don't bother me, and go back to your echochamber.

@Buddha

Alright.

You're correct. I do, in fact, draw the line at otherkin. But fuck, I wouldn't go so far as to call them mentally ill, jesus.

More over than that, a lot of them don't truly believe themselves to be whatever they 'kin' themselves with, but rather have a strong connection to whatever it is.

I fail to see what this has to do with gender identities, however.

The Unpopular Opinions Thread.

@Ace of Hearts So a dogkin is somehow valid to you. Where do you draw the line?

Cause I draw the line at 2 genders, and that includes people who shift between them. Gender can change by the day - if you act male one day and female the next, then your gender is male 1 day and female the next.

The idea that people's 'identification' is somehow the deciding factor is retarded because there is literally no limits to this identification.

@Buddha

>Be me
>on internet
>some fucking guy tells me to not speak objectively about the identity of people I don't know
>ask him if he believes in dogkin, that's ridiculous, innit?
>fuckinggothim.jpg.

Hey, that's great. It's a very narrow minded viewpoint to have, and especially to base this view on the extreme cases that are bretty rare, but good on you pal.

<Snipped quote by Ace of Hearts>

I'm sorry sir, but your personal standards are not the benchmark of what gets to be Unpopular and what gets to be 'cancer'.
If the views in this thread offend you then you are free to start your own Popular Opinions thread, where you can all gush over Undertale and Pocky.

Thank You.

@Dynamo Frokane

The fuck it is.

Now, I'm sorry I don't have your tolerance to Nazi Apologists, but...

The Unpopular Opinions Thread.

If anyone thinks this thread is cancer, then why the hell are you posting here?

The key is in the name, stop complaining that the Unpopular Opinions aren't Popular with you.

@Dynamo Frokane

Unpopular = "Overwatch sucks."

Fucking Cancer = "Nazis weren't war criminals my dudes."

*POSITIVE* LGBT++ hangout, anybody? *CIS/STRAIGHT WELCOME TOO* :D

straight to supporting them. :S typical. I'm out.
don't encourage the (subliminal or active) enablement of womanizers, passively**

@ArcaneUnit

What does this even mean.

The Unpopular Opinions Thread.

>be me
>some guy on the internet finds the best example of an extreme case with a few supporters like it's an insta-win button

Listen. Sure. This man is not mentally well, I agree, and he's co-opting onto a transgender identity.

So what?

Do you believe that one dude = an entire community of people?

Do you believe that the LGBT community is monolithic? That if some people think one way, they all do?

Come on.

"A dog bit me; therefor, all dogs bite."