Avatar of Darlit Glitch
  • Last Seen: 3 yrs ago
  • Joined: 9 yrs ago
  • Posts: 2438 (0.76 / day)
  • VMs: 0
  • Username history
    1. Darlit Glitch 9 yrs ago

Status

Recent Statuses

7 yrs ago
Current When going to the abyss, you must ask yourself, "am I still sane?" constantly.
1 like
8 yrs ago
what do you do when you are both mildly sad, and mildly happy all the time?
1 like
8 yrs ago
Memes

Bio

User has no bio, yet

Most Recent Posts

If only it was so easy.
<Snipped quote by Darlit Glitch>

That's more complicated than infiltrating it with stealth?

<Snipped quote by ZAVAZggg>

It seems that the problem would still exist. We would have to teleport it without the individuals included.


Stealth is pretty easy. Avoid getting seen, knock out any who see you, and if all else fails then we use force.
Besides, the plan I'm suggesting doesn't use stealth the entire way.
Could we, and I know this is going to sound crazy but bear with me, teleport the entire thing somewhere else?


From what I heard, wrecking the whole thing hurts the planet, so I doubt it.
<Snipped quote by Darlit Glitch>

Not if we don't drill through them.


...I was saying that's why we avoid drilling and flying. The more complicated something is the less likely it is to succeeded.
<Snipped quote by Darlit Glitch>

Drilling a hole to our destination seems to be the fastest and least confrontational method. We stand several chances of being discovered if utilizing the primary entrances.


But we also risk harming the very people we wish to free in this operation if we do so.
<Snipped quote by Darlit Glitch>

I'm focusing on destruction because a direct path to our destination prevents us from coming into conflict with living beings that we wish to avoid destroying.


But the destruction itself will have a far more likely chance of unintentionally hurting those we wish to avoid hurting. We're trying to take back a planet not conquer it. By focusing on stealth and then raw confrontation we avoid getting civilian casualties involved and reduce the time spent causing harm.

We're there to get in, wreck the thing safely, and get out.
<Snipped quote by Realmatic>

I see. Then controlled, precise destruction from above? We can crush a path directly to the access points.


I think you're focusing too much on destruction, as much as I would have no quelm if it didn't conflict with our goals.
<Snipped quote by ZAVAZggg>

It's definitely more on the unusual side of things, especially with the rapid style of everything. But with the right people, I think it gives it a much greater level of interactivity than writing paragraphs to each other. To me (in this circumstance), it genuinely feels like being surrounded by eleven others in a room and trying to figure out the best way of approaching this.


I quite agree. The conversations themselves lend more to the immersion then any book I've ever read, though webcomics andmanga are a close second.
<Snipped quote by Darlit Glitch>

I leave the strategy to you, but there are vital concerns that must be noted.


Then may I make some personal suggestions?
<Snipped quote by Darlit Glitch>

It may be a worthwhile risk.


I'd leave that choice to the operation leader, which is likely seth in this case.
© 2007-2024
BBCode Cheatsheet