<Snipped quote by Efficacy>
Hey, the writers were dumb. Doesn't say anything about potentially passages.
Sloth is a deadly sin. I'm not gonna argue that. But they didn't give biblical advice, they gave speculatory and personal experience advice. If yhvh warns against laziness, then providing those passages would've been biblical advice. They didn't really do that. They also ignored context of the quotes, hence my first point.
"a sin you "can't help" is still a sin, and there's no excuse other than ignorance." Noooooo. Wrong. There is a huge difference in how they have to be handled. Example: You can't help getting aroused at the sight of what you're attracted to. You can help whether or not you seek that out. You can't say "oh just don't seek it out" when the problem is that the sight is constantly there and claim that it's still applicable and that there's no difference.
Reading the article, he seems to have provided sound Biblical evidence for each main point. The second paragraph is slightly obscured, because the logic for the main idea is provided near the end of the paragraph.
See, the thing is, God commands us to "take captive our thoughts" and provides us with the help of the Holy Spirit. So, though the sight and the tendency for any chronic sin are constantly there, God wants us to resist those temptations. So, if one has chronic laziness--that is, the tendency to be lazy--God wants us to resist that, and provides us with the strength to do so. The first article I sent says why it's a problem; the second article I sent says what God thinks about it (and at the end, what God wants us to do instead); the third article provides a proper attitude on work.