Avatar of Gwynbleidd
  • Last Seen: 4 yrs ago
  • Joined: 11 yrs ago
  • Posts: 1247 (0.31 / day)
  • VMs: 3
  • Username history
    1. Gwynbleidd 7 yrs ago
    2. █████████ 11 yrs ago

Status

User has no status, yet

Bio

User has no bio, yet

Most Recent Posts

A lot of things have been covered here already!

Uhh, I think you can get fast passes and such on some rides using your ticket. I forget exactly, but there will be a time stamp telling you when to go back to that ride and it will be much faster to get on so you don't have to get stuck behind a colossal amount of people. Lines are reeeallllyyyy big down in Disneyland.

Space Mountain's fun. Splash Mountain's fun. Matterhorn was pretty solid if I'm remembering it correctly. Splash and Matterhorn have some water splash so uh, yeah be careful with that lol. That is if you get on. But yeah, these are popular rides so definitely hit them early before the yyyyuuuuuuggggeeee lines of people begin hoarding up. Theme of the day is big lines, kids.

If you're going there and staying into the night, the Fantasmic show is pretty cool alongside the fireworks and all that. Enjoy your time there. It's pretty fun, also a lot of things not to like but overall I've enjoyed the two whole times I've been there.
I think the biggest misunderstanding of the first amendment and a person's right to free speech is that many people forget that it only keeps the government from punishing you, it does not protect you from criticism or punishment from your neighbor, employer, host, etc. as long as they adhere to other laws. An employer or social media host may reserve the right to fire you or kick you off their website, but the moment someone lays their hands on you, you can try them for assault. But you can't be tried for how you express yourself unless it's slander, hate speech, and so on. A good way of looking at it is "your rights end when another person's begins".

Whether I agree with it or not, Twitter is within their rights to do as they please with their platform. The ability to post through Twitter's services is a privilege.

Similar to this topic is a topic I heard on NPR. Should the president be able to block people on Twitter? Is it a form of censorship to shut down people's voices and ability to be heard?


Different line of topic entirely, I one hundred percent agree with the notion a company has the right to operate they want to operate within the realm of the law.

However, from a personal perspective, using vaguely worded 'hate speech' and 'harassment' guidelines as a shield to delete users who are generally providing a different viewpoint from the mainstream to be highly detestable. The problem with Twitter or any other platform banning users for 'hate speech' and 'harassment' is that those words most likely mean different things to different people. So, if you ban someone, you are taking a side.

If you don't ban, the other side may claim you're taking the other side. But, if you don't ban any person regardless of their opinion; you are, in fact, being neutral.

Let's also not forget that ad sponsorship is being selectively pulled from people who espouse 'unfavorable' content no matter the degree of actual, provable 'hate' on YouTube and therefore makes it difficult for them to continue creating their content. This practice should be frowned upon, and I wonder if it should be illegal.
Since this came out today, I'd thought I'd share it:
-video snip-

Rather powerful and compelling; it questions so much about people's right to free speech.


Different strokes for different folks, I suppose. I didn't find that to be compelling or powerful. Maybe a tiny bit compelling.

They try to make a point about racists, misogynists, and all these other alleged discriminatory people, but at the same time manage to stereotype a frat bro and call him 'Chadwick'. Not the most effective way to make a point, it almost levels the entire video's meaning and subverts it by being a hypocrite through becoming what they're supposedly fighting against. At least, that's my take. Granted, it's one piece of the video, and a small one at that.

Is there a more poignant point to be looked at by analyzing the potential downsides of a Wild West Twitter where troll-slingers are shooting out verbal haymakers left and right, swiss-cheesing users with the bullet holes of their fully, genius wit-loaded e-rifles? Yeah, maybe.

However, I'm of the school of thought where free speech is free speech; it is absolute outside of extremely specific circumstances like attempting to stoke a riot. Twitter shuts down accounts from both sides, and sometimes the reasons are legitimate, and other times they're utterly unwarranted. I'd rather have a truly neutral online space. Say what you want. Be a dick, and therefore someone else will be a dick back to you.

If anything, a three strike policy of consistently provable and legitimate harassment would be my method of arbitrating a possible account suspension or outright ban. And, the jury would need to be diverse in their mode of thought for potential adjudication.

Regardless, there's always going to be people who say stupid shit, and who try to start stupid shit. Just like you would in real life, you ignore them and move on with your day and your life. But if we're going to attempt to use Twitter trolls as an avenue to shut down alleged hate speech, inevitably we're going to be walking right up to the slippery slope of censorship.

That never ends well, for anyone.
The Witcher 3 is an excellent choice, obviously I have no bias here on that count.

Since you've beaten me to that, I think I'll say Knights of the Old Republic. That may have been the most important gaming moment for me growing up.
Meno: Is this true about yourself, Socrates, that you don’t even know what virtue is? Is this the report that we are to take home about you?

Socrates: Not only that, you may also say that, to the best of my belief, I have never met anyone else who did know.

Meno: What! Didn’t you meet Gorgias when he was here?

Socrates: Yes.

Meno: And you still didn’t think he knew?

Socrates: I’m a forgetful sort of person, and I can’t say just now what I thought at the time. Probably he did know, and I expect you know what he used to say about it. So remind me what it was, or tell me yourself if you will. No doubt you agree with him.

Meno: Yes, I do.

Socrates: Then let’s leave him out of it, since after all he isn’t here. What do you yourself say virtue is?

- Plato
<Snipped quote by POOHEAD189>

And I'm in danger of attributing that crazy to the left in general, because I generalize, so apologies in advance if I wind up getting there.


Never apologize, that's what the media wants you to do in an effort to control you. FIGHT THE POWER.
I played WoW for a few days. Got to level ten as a Tauren and a Night Elf. Vanilla WoW, that is. Haven't played since, mostly because my broken arm healed and I never looked back. MMOs have never been my cup of tea. Did enjoy myself for a little bit, anyway.

Starcraft: Brood War is my preferred game. GOLIATH ONLINE. I suck at the actual game tho, I just do UMS stuff.
@Dark Wind I assume you read them in English? I was always kind of hesitant to read them because they'd be translations and some of the storytelling flair would be lost when transferred to English.


I did. I have no doubt that there is probably something lost within the translations. Even still, the writing is top tier.
@POOHEAD189 If you want to have a go with mind theories, just explore the Brain in a vat theory.

Addition: I think I had a debate with someone about this here once. It was about truth being subjective or objective. My statement is that the truth is always objective, personal truths aren't really truths so much as they are perspectives/opinions. And, the proof of objective truth is the simple and inarguable premise that somewhere there is existence. We may be figments of an imagination, but there has to be an imaginer beyond that.

And that's all there is to that, lol, way to get me going on philosophy.
© 2007-2024
BBCode Cheatsheet