• Last Seen: 1 yr ago
  • Joined: 11 yrs ago
  • Posts: 155 (0.04 / day)
  • VMs: 0
  • Username history
    1. Sifter 11 yrs ago
  • Latest 10 profile visitors:

Status

User has no status, yet

Bio

User has no bio, yet

Most Recent Posts

Nevermind...

Edit: Well, since nobody is posting... I found this picture while browsing Ubisoft Forums.

Assallya said
VI driving is available now in real life and drives better than people. It has a few drawbacks, like being unable to resolve bicyclists but that was solved by Google some months back. Not using it is killing one United States citizens every eight minutes!In truth, I'm surprised they're not in the game already. Not every vehicle for certain but some delivery trucks on repetitive routes I can certainly see.


So? Volkswagen has "Temporary Auto Pilot", GM has "Electric Networked Vehicles", Nissan has autonomous vehicle prototypes, heck, let's not even look at BMW who are working on their side with it since 2005.

One of the best things that happened to me in Watch_Dogs was when some jackass, either, cut me off or hit another jackass. Then I liked derping around the crash scene, but NPC's weren't scripted to do anything more than just swear. One of the worst things that I could think in this RP would be having my car hacked, since, that would count as legitimate powergame (Worst kind, since, you can't do anything about it).

Assallya said
Not using it is killing one United States citizens every eight minutes!


Well, as evil as this sounds, we sometimes need to shave off unnecesary weight... Sorry, survival of the fittest, natural selection... That kind of stuff.

Edit: Last thing to say, neither you, nor I (I mean this mostly for myself) have the right to decide such a matter. Either we vote or the GM decides for us (As they say - "Dictatorship by a genius is better than tyranny by fools.") or we use my compromise... Anyway - Sifter out.
Rare said
Kaithas, your character is accepted. Sifter, I like that image you did, I like Shakespeare as well. You must spend time in photoshop.


I did it in under 5 minutes in paint, also, I dont use photoshop as I can just use pixlr (Computer tools should be free). Just wait untill I make a .gif for my signature.
Assallya said
We could also have this set slightly in the future with a 2.0 CTos. Nothing huge. Self driving cars and delivery trucks for instance, flying quad copter drones instead of CT scans. (Ie. The drones don't constantly patrol, just come out when an area needs additional surveillance.)Can you imagine ammunition deliveries by drone from your favorite local gun shop? How about beer and taco?


No, no, no, no, no.... Please no... I agree with the DT's, but... 2014 works, one year after Watch_Dogs. We can actually start in 2014 and then (if RP survives the beggining, then nothing can stop it) make a timeskip, let's just start... Yeah, sure we can use drones, but A.I. driving? I think thats an overkill.

Edit: Just thought of a compromise, I remember somebody mentioning that the story would take place in ARCs - So, each arc would take place some time in between (ranging from 4-12 months to even 2 years). Let's say we start in 2014 and end in somewhere 2026-2031
Kaithas said
I turn my glance back to SEG_FAULT again. Speaking of which, I wrote up the leader's profile and faction description if anyone wants to take a looksee.


A very interesting character, great job... Dude?
Assallya said
Welcome to the kooky world of terrorism....


;D

Well, if I think with my brain... The DT's (Domestic Terrorists) could actualy go DedSec and terrorize the city by using ctOS (Which I think is what you meant), making casualities and blaming Blume.



Which makes more sense. They could start as allies, but once we understand their true tactics we put them on the "n*gga"list.

Assallya said
Alternatively, though it's a little late, one could have the city being invaded by domestic terrorists, anti CTos forces. They could either be primary antagonists or yet a third party.The interesting thing is that they probably have similar goals to our Vigilante group, bringing down the CT grid, but are much less concerned about loss of life. It could start out with a "frenemy" angle and then explode into full mad on hate.Use it... or not :)


Seems like an interesting idea, but if they would terrorise the citizens and destabilize the city wouldn't the public opinion be that of pro-ctOS? The result would be the total apposite of the goal...
Rare said


Revans Exile said



I know what you ment... Anyway, thats for GM to decide or we could vote.
I am logging off, so shut up and watch:

Something I made (Gotta love Shakespeare), this was ment for my first post, but if you want you can use it.

So good night to some. Good mornin' to some. ;)
© 2007-2024
BBCode Cheatsheet