If you could change one law in another country, which would you pick?

[Awson]

I'll save mine for after a few of yours.

It can be for the greater good or the greater evil. Or personal gains.

[Vilageidiotx]

For personal gains? Okay.

I would require the British to give me all their stuff.

[BrobyDDark]

I would change the law in North Korea where teachers have to know accordian to teachers have to punch their supreme leader in the nuts every day until he stops being a dictator.

[Antarctic Termite]

Can I change constitutional law and turn America's electoral system into a single nation-wide preferential ballot?

[Awson]

Not very creative, guys.

I'd make the world a better place and remove the Japanese porn censorship law.

[Doivid]

I'd remove the law in China where you're not allowed to make films about 'alternate realities'

[Clirkus]

I'd revoke all laws in Canada and see what happens.

[Halo]

If I could change it in my country, I'd change it so that the government can't trigger Article 50 without another, legally-binding referendum. I'm happy to accept the results of democracy when people actually know the stakes, now.

In literally any other country, I'd make hourly vocal prayer to Harambe compulsory. Because creativity is hard.

[scribz]

if it could apply internationally, it would be severe limitation of the use of fossil fuels.

if it could apply nationally it would probably be to make the billionaire class who capitalized from their wrong-doing in the crashes accountable.

[mdk]

Repeal Article 9 in Japan.

[Vilageidiotx]

Repeal Article 9 in Japan.

@mdk

Shit, I dunno, do we want to let that tiger out of the bag? Those crazy shits can do a war.

[mdk]

<Snipped quote by mdk>

Shit, I dunno, do we want to let that tiger out of the bag? Those crazy shits can do a war.

@Vilageidiotx

I surely do. WORLD POLICE is a source of friction. Give Japan a military and the DPRK -- whenever it goes, it's inevitable that it goes at some point -- will be the moment in history when the US, China, Japan, Russia, and SK (and possibly the EU and everybody else) joins the battlefield all together as allies.

On the one hand, I want to bring as many nations as possible into the new-world-order that will arise from that future alliance (because it will be absolutely necessary, for humanitarian reasons). On the other, I am all in favor of international security which is not wholly dependent on US foreign policy. Give Japan an army and let them worry about the South China Sea. I mean I don't need the South China Sea for anything. You need it for anything?

[Vilageidiotx]

<Snipped quote by Vilageidiotx>

I surely do. WORLD POLICE is a source of friction. Give Japan a military and the DPRK -- whenever it goes, it's inevitable that it goes at some point -- will be the moment in history when the US, China, Japan, Russia, and SK (and possibly the EU and everybody else) joins the battlefield all together as allies.

On the one hand, I want to bring as many nations as possible into the new-world-order that will arise from that future alliance (because it will be absolutely necessary, for humanitarian reasons). On the other, I am all in favor of international security which is not wholly dependent on US foreign policy. Give Japan an army and let them worry about the South China Sea. I mean I don't need the South China Sea for anything. You need it for anything?

@mdk

Naw man, I'm perfectly cool with other countries picking up the slack. Just shitposting.

[BrokenPromise]

I would make it legal to kill Li'l kim and his closest script monkeys who are running the country through him.