"Ah, yes. The contract, primarily. And the note in itself. You seemed to be extremely prideful in that note to prove who was the better of the two, No? You didn't care about being a stockholder. but as you said, he was a "Wonder kid." You wanted to prove you were better than him. It was a matter of pride, infarct. And considering what occurred, you had lost that bet. He had damaged your pride, and that is why you took your revenge against him. Plus, both of your contracts are extremely similar. I doubt that wasn't a "coincidence". Plus, the phone is circumstantial evidence. Face it, you have to admit it. From your behaviors and the evidence surrounding it, alongside your initial statements about the victim. It's more then clear that you had a strong motive to dispose of him in the end, don't you agree with me?