Avatar of Durandal
  • Last Seen: 7 yrs ago
  • Joined: 10 yrs ago
  • Posts: 1238 (0.34 / day)
  • VMs: 1
  • Username history
    1. Durandal 10 yrs ago

Status

Recent Statuses

8 yrs ago
Current The boys are back in town
8 yrs ago
You load sixteen tons and what do you get?
1 like
9 yrs ago
Die for the Emperor, or die trying.
2 likes
9 yrs ago
Took some political alignment and bias tests today. I think the results were skewed.
1 like
9 yrs ago
You are what you dare, or so some say. Don't be that guy who is forever after known as the one who set his pants on fire.
1 like

Bio

User has no bio, yet

Most Recent Posts

<Snipped quote by Durandal>

Both.


Thanks for the clarification.

And as to the British....protectionist policies. No silly pounds in the GEC.
<Snipped quote by Willy Vereb>

Yep, those are allowed!


What allowed, large, solid-state lasers, tank rail guns, or both?
<Snipped quote by raja1020>

I think no one has claimed Iran...yet ;)


The Reich shall rule the world. Heil Merkel!
<Snipped quote by Willy Vereb>

I have comparatively little interest in Europe. If I do expand in Europe through the course of the roleplay, it would only be to take back Moldova/the Baltic countries.

The Caliphate and the post-American countries probably have the most to fear.

Which countries would still have nuclear arsenals?


Unless the US forces retrieved their nuclear weapons stationed in Europe, then the GEC would have near one hundred warheads.
<Snipped quote by Durandal>Problem is that Slovakia's territories are part of the Carpathian mountains, meaning they are priority.
That and I don't think your European nation could've effectively fought back after WW3, that's the interesting part of it.
Actually while rivalry is expected I kind of also think that your nation and mine may wish to burry the hatchet in preparation for the neverending wave of red from Midhar's Super Soviet Union.

Makes sense enough to me. Very well, then.
@Willy Vereb

How do you feel about having Slovakia as a point of contention between our respective nations, with each of us controlling roughly half the territory? Or possibly Austria, since under your sheet you say you have a part of it.
<Snipped quote by Durandal>

I'm sorry if I seemed to be speaking authoritatively, I was just trying to offer advice. It's your call ultimately. But yes, 178 million sounds reasonable.


It was my part to have done more research on the populations I was dealing with rather than simply decide something arbitrarily. Though without knowing the severity of the war itself in the Central European area, I simply went with a truly devastating war as the basis. Combined with central Europe's currently declining population, I assumed less. Though when I spoke about diversity, I meant mostly about European ethnicities, not taking into accounts things such as race but rather national identification taking precedence.
178 million sound more reasonable to you?
<Snipped quote by Durandal>

Well, the current British population is over a hundred million, and your union of a dozen different states, including Germany, is a fraction of that.

Planning to be strong in the future is just all the more reason to take out a loan. Spend spend spend!


I may be over a dozen states but most of them aren't really all that big. Though I did kind of forget Italy's current population, I just realized.
War is expensive. Take out your loans while interest rates are competitive.

EU 2.0 seems to have quite a small population.


To hell with your loans. :P The Reich shall rise again!
And you did steal quite a bit of it, not to mention the EU 2.0 was the punching ground for the European theater in part, I assume.
© 2007-2024
BBCode Cheatsheet