• Last Seen: MIA
  • Joined: 11 yrs ago
  • Posts: 369 (0.09 / day)
  • VMs: 0
  • Username history
    1. HazmatMedic 11 yrs ago

Status

User has no status, yet

Bio

User has no bio, yet

Most Recent Posts

Legion X51 said
Come on, then, you motherfucker. Bring it. You have no shit on me!


Please tell me that was jovial.
Oh, crikey, what have I done?
TheSovereignGrave said
Anyway, so is everything settled? We're all good?


Yeah. We have a new GM who knows what he's doing and talking about. Hopefully, no-one will mind if I kick around for a little bit longer.
Boerd, you'll probably have to PM him now.
Of course, of course. I think what has happened is a few crossed wires. I said something, meaning for it to sound playful and lighthearted, and it came out as rude and vicious. For that, I sincerely apoligise.
Alfhedil said
I lean towards the actual history of the matter, in that what Legion has posted is historically correct. However in the past we had a similar issue regarding gunpowder in general, in which we ended up going with the "Don't be a Dick" rule. Essentially, each person was relatively free to construct their nation and military as they wished, so long as they clearly weren't trying to one-up someone else, or abuse a mechanic. To that point, I feel the reverse should be held in regards to cannons, in that they should be allowable as land-defenses, and limited for naval usage.However, as always, "Don't be a Dick" supercedes "Be realistic"


Then that's what we'll do.
Welcome to the GM spot, Alfhedil. In all seriousness, please do a better job than I did.
Faulty said
And at that outburst, I'm out of this RP. As a GM, and especially as this is your first go at it, you should always be open to criticism and help, and when your own knowledge is lacking you should never be less than ecstatic to learn more. Attacking people for giving you information that you clearly didn't have earlier isn't helpful for anyone, let alone yourself, and the fact one of your rules is to keep it realistic serves to emphasise the fact that you're just going to use your role as GM to try and smack down anyone who disagrees with you. Let's look at what you've said.Not the language a GM should be using. I don't care if Legion fisted your new born babies and used them as boxing gloves to fend off your grieving wife, that outburst of language is unacceptable for a GM. You, as GM, must always show restraint and must always take the higher, more respectable ground by being calm and considerate. Saying "screw you" because you've had your feelings hurt for people following your own rules isn't conducive to a good RP.This is without mentioning your overall tone. Instantly you're on the defensive - "I never said land cannons are unacceptable" - and yet all Legion can be accused of doing is following your rules, specifically rule three on the very first page, "3. Keep it realistic".I've had my reservations about this RP for a while now, especially since I saw how you sought attention when people last had the unbelievable audacity to question your judgement by repeatedly claiming you couldn't do it, and thereby repeatedly gaining assurances that you could and you were brilliant and you were amazing and special and good and true and the one GM to rule them all and in the darkness bind them all. It's particularly glaring that you had that entire episode of ostensible self-doubt by the fact you moaned over and over that you didn't feel comfortable being GM, but have made no move to transfer power.I'm sorry, but that this is your first GMing of an RP is no excuse, and you should know full well how to behave. Attacking people for following you rules, and then having you break them yourself by calling for us to "take history out of it for a jiffy" is the height of hypocrisy, and those doubts I had about this RP, and believe me there were many, are now just too much to bear and I withdraw. Using your position as GM to smack down other players is rude and unnecessary, and I can confidently say that, even in the first RP I ever GMed - which, incidentally, went well because all an RP needs to be GMed properly is patience, research, and, god forbid, effort - I never once went out of my way to make another RPer feel little or irrelevant, and, God as my witness, I've never said "screw you" to any other RPer I've ever RPed with.

#yoloswag


I really want to refute all of this, but all I can really say is...
The first one falls.
Alfhedil said
I will gladly do so.


The stage is yours, my friend. What is your opinion on the cannon issue?
Bloody hell, it was meant to be a jovial "Damnit" like when a friend of yours makes fun of you, not a "You suck and everything you ever hope to achieve sucks" everyone is making it out to be!
ASTA said
To be fair, ships didn't go down after one or two shots. Ships of this era were fairly robust, and could endure multiple hits from cannons. I don't know much about this, however. Do any of our native history buffs care to chime in?


I know. But boat cannons do to boats what land cannons do to walls. A land cannon shooting at a boat will do a crikey-load of damage. Boats have the benifit of being faster to build.
Alfhedil said
Wow. Okay. That really shows what kind of GM you are.


Well, I did say someone else could GM. If you want, you can take over.

Legion X51 said
Not going any further than this.


I am keeping it realistic. Realistically, a boats cannon will be less powerful than a siege cannon.
© 2007-2024
BBCode Cheatsheet