• Last Seen: MIA
  • Joined: 11 yrs ago
  • Posts: 369 (0.09 / day)
  • VMs: 0
  • Username history
    1. HazmatMedic 11 yrs ago

Status

User has no status, yet

Bio

User has no bio, yet

Most Recent Posts

Raptorman said
So my race is fine then?


As long as you don't grow any more, yes. =P
Darkraven said
Not that there's any true depiction of Slenderman, unless... D:


Swiftly moving on, who is exporting food?
Darkraven said
I didn't know slenderman is that tall. He seem to look like 8-10 feet tall to me... But yeah I'm cool with the height limitation. Only a minority from my race will ever approach it.


Apparently, depictions of Slendy vary between about 8 foot to 15 foot. Don't know how true that is, but oh well.
Raptorman said
Hazmat if you actually had taken the time to read the nations that have already been submitted there is a race that has a height of 12-14 feet. They are in many ways essentially humans scaled up and so certainly fit your definition of humanoid. I expect you to rescind the completely random decision on an arbitrary height limit now.


Why does everyone assume I don't read the posts that are put up? Please keep a respectful tone. Next time, just say "Hazmat, there is already a race of..." and so on and so forth.

Slenderman height is 15 foot, Hobbit height is 4 foot. I have a height restriction to stop people recreating Giants - the last thing we need are a bunch of 20 foot barbarians that hate people parading about and destroying everything us little men are working for. Not to mention the sheer strength one giant has... I do not enjoy the idea of setting up a new civilisation on the moon.
The "humanoid" ruling is to stop things like Giants or a race of sentient mushrooms. Demons that can't use magic shouldn't be a problem as long as they are roughly human-sized (Hobbit-height is shortest, Slenderman height is tallest. I'll get exact numbers later), are upright, have less than 8 limbs and NO WINGS.
I remember an RP once where a race had wings. They won every battle because they could fly above the opponent and rain hell, and no-one could do squit because the armies were very melee focussed. So, no wings.
I don't suppose it makes a huge difference. I was basically trying to say it would be unlikely to be vandalised on Wikipedia.
I use Wikipedia all the time! I don't think it is unreliable, I'm saying that some people think Wikipedia is unreliable. God, Alf, think before you post ;-)

Also, by subtle I meant it isn't commonly known, certainly not as common as iron, steel or bronze.
@Sovereign - Don't worry about it. Take your time - I'd rather you had a high-quality nation you want to play over some hastily cobbled junk.

@ Shimm/Alf - 1. Would you prefer I called you Shimm or Alf?
2. I know people say wikipedia is unreliable, but I doubt someone would screw about with something as subtle as Vanadium, so I guess that counts as a reliable source. However, just because somethings makes no reference to something doesn't necessarily mean it doesn't happen. It might still happen elsewhere.

Not trying to nitpick, just trying to keep things fair.
As I understand, Vanadium IS commonly found bound to other minerals, however. Can I ask you both to source your knowledge?
How is Vanadium of any use if it cannot be isolated?

Edit: Strike that, apparently it's a good alloy and is rust-resistant. Not sure how true that is. Anyone care to explain?
© 2007-2024
BBCode Cheatsheet