Hirothelegend

Naruto - Legend of the Bijuu's - Part I - OOC

Time Skip has been posted alongside wit Oda's post

Naruto - Legend of the Bijuu's - Part I - OOC

Oda Uchiha
Oda looked at Tesla. "Hmp, this Earth Dome is forming so I'm fine from the attacks..." He said as the Earth Dome was developing then he released and no more Earth Dome. "If I want this to be public I have to make sure people can see it!" He thought to himself. Suddenly an ANBU shows up with Daisuke Fukui. "Sir' we found another one!" He said. Oda smiled and looked at Tesla. "If so, then protect Shira while I do this with this one..." He said dropping Shira and placing Daisuke down. "Everyone! This is what happens when you work for the Republic!" He said preforming the justu to rip the Shukaku out of Daisuke and sealing in in the jar in public. "You will surely die by my hands, I will guarantee it!" Oda had said. At this point however anybody can now retrieve Shira from Oda since he was busy giving the ANBU Daisuke's body.

~Gokage Summit~

The Samurai general, who saw the 5 Kage finally enter, stodd up to greet the Kage. "Good Afternoon Kage! We are here to discuss the actions of Konoha. Before I start I have here a Representative of Konoha representing the Hokage for he is to busy to be in this mission. Now then let's read this letter Oda Uchiha has sent us to read to you all.!" He said taking out the letter unfolding it.

"Dear Unwelcomed guest,
I love how hypocritical you are. You want peace yet you are using violence to do so... didn't Tendo Pain or Nagato did the same thing years ago? And what happened... a Great Ninja War occured, 4th one should I add. Using violence we not move this stubborn wall. You Republics have nothing to offer that I see fit, so once again no. By the way... thank you for the Jinchuurikies! That was a plesant gift to have... Enjoy your meeting! ~Uchiha Oda"

The Samurai has just finished reading. "Now we may start the discussion and may we please have this done in a orderly fashion..." The Samurai General announced.

Naruto - Legend of the Bijuu's - Part I - OOC

Shadow has giving me permission!

EDIT:Since Shadow is unavaliable, I will preform the Time Skip myself and start the Summit

Naruto - Legend of the Bijuu's - Part I - OOC

Nero said
10:36PM, I'm drinking some beer and smoking a cigarrete while thinking about how life is good.And how I should probably make this official: I'm, literally, leaving the roleplay. To make it easier for ya'll, here:Anko should be recognized by the ANBU as a missing-nin and therefore executed immediately after an amazing battle. (fyeah)Daisuke slept. The one-tail took over and raged over Konohagakure, kill him immediatelly. (Or just think of something that's not as destructive, so you guys don't have to pay attention to a character whom the player isn't even on the RP, anymore.)K, bye. Take care.

Okie dokie, I'll ask Shadow if I can have his tails extracted and sealed in the Jar planned for Shira. If a character is going out mind as well make use of him/her.

Naruto - Legend of the Bijuu's - Part I - OOC

Oda Uchiha
Oda turned to see the clone. "Find the Jinchuuriki in this village, capture them and bring them to me is what you should be doing while everyone is panicking, don't you see? I drew the attention of everyone in the village and I'm sure the Jinchuuriki are going to come and save their friend, or else I'm a step closer into accomplishing my goals..." He said in a menacing tone. With a few more steps he finally reach the center. "In case of an emergency..." He thought has he dropped Shira like a rock and preformed seals for Earth Dome. "Earth Dome!" He had said. The Dome formed slowly, and at this point would allow others to quickly come by if they were fast enough.

Naruto - Legend of the Bijuu's - Part I - OOC

Prince said
Character Death Allowed Player Killing, Player Consent Required Player Rights, impact on setting, impact on plot, OOC influence on ICAllowing player killing adds several elements to a roleplay, including depth, character motivation and realism. The depth it adds is through many facets: emotional impact, time lapse and character development. It motivates characters and players themselves because both know they have the chance of dying. It also adds reality to a character and player if they are not completely safe. A player will roleplay a character a lot more realistically and character traits will be more obvious. A brave character will have better rewards and consequences for his actions. A timid character will often be more safe. A calculating character will have a higher success rate while a brash one will simply roll with the punches. The chance for death, in addition to getting hurt and other negative side effects, highlights character personalities, roleplayer skill and roleplay styles.Allowing player killing may add more depth, but it may detract depth as well. By giving characters the ability to kill, it can derail a character by making them a tool for power. Additionally, more powerful characters are given too many advantages when their power can result in simply ending another character during conflict. Allowing player killing simlpy creates a system to be abused within a roleplay, regardless of the depth it may add. Brash characters will die faster. Timid characters will be boring. Calculating characters will just kill who they can, then hide. It will become less of a roleplay and more of a 'game'.Forcing players to consent to their character death, first and foremost, promotes out of character interaction, which is just as important to a roleplay as in character interactions. Everynone should be on the same page with the same understanding and no single player should have their rights infringed on. It is not fair that anyone more powerful than their character can just swipe by and kill them, ruining all of their hard work and development. Players often develop an emotional connection to their character and an abrupt, unwanted end can leave them with remorse and no catharsis. These negative feelings can be a detriment to a community, thus forcing character consent can prevent such grievances. By allowing players the right to deny their character death, they can influence a roleplay greatly from the out of character. Whereas it may be vastly unfair to have a character die without a proper end, it is also vastly unfair to force another character to act out of character in an in character situation because of an out of character decision made by someone completely arbitrary to the character and the player. While it is important to preserve peace and encourage interaction out of character, it is also important to preserve the integrity of a setting and plot. By allowing players the ability to deny a justified action, the system can be abused and thus negatively influence the roleplay.Both arguments create a system that can be abused.Each system promotes different aspects of the roleplay; plot depth and strength vs. community strength and bonding for apk and rpc respectivelyEach argument seems to defend one side of a situation, e.g. allowed player killing defends someone who killed a character properly while required consent defends someone who died unfairlyAfter analysis, the primary conflict is simply that both systems can be abused and work on the assumption that someone will abuse it. Thus, it is only logical to create a situation where no single party is at fault.Player A roleplays RPC A properly. RPC A is a very brash, confident character who is willing to fight a shinobi above their skill level alone. Player B roleplays RPC B properly. RPC B is calm character that abides by the rules of his village and is more powerful than RPC A. RPC A engages in a fight with RPC B and loses. RPC B is faced with killing RPC A. The rules of his village are to kill enemy shinobi if possible. RPC B kills RPC A. The fight was fair, entertaining and each RPC was played to the best of their respective players' abilities with each party playing fairly.If Player A does not wish for their character to die and only claims it was within their character to act as they did while also providing evidence, is it fair for Player B to skill kill them? Does Player A deserve the right to say "No, you may not kill my character," when there has been no fault on either party and force Player B to break their character to do so.Logically, no. Giving Player A that right is infringing on the right of Player B to properly roleplay a character. No player inherently deserves the right to tell another player they cannot act within the given confines of their logical actions.Even with the conclusion that no player deserves the right to tell another player that they may not do something that their character can, could and should do in a situation like the aforementioned scenario, it was not that conclusion that brought forth the argument. It was the worry of abusing a system set forth. Thus, if the logical solution is to allow player death, developing methods to avoid system abuse for allowing it are needed. Overall solution, look for methods to avoid instances where players can abuse their right to kill others and create numerous ways to avoid said player-killing. If a Player wants to simply kill others, remove them. If a Player breaks character to kill another, remove them. A player should play their character to play their character, interact with others and develop their character and the story, not kill others. A character should not be designed to kill others. A system should be set forth to avoid player killing. Leaders of the roleplay should guide characters away from situations that cannot be manipulated to avoid said player killing. In the event that player killing happens, it should be known that it is acceptable and it should have to be justified. Before it is finalized, attempt to "retroactively continue" aka retcon a situation to avoid the player death. Create good leadership, create strong bonds in the community, avoid players who wish to abuse their rights in ways that will negatively effect others and potentially allow a retcon if both parties accept. Retcons can force players to roleplay a scenario that results in a certain way. That is not roleplay. It should only be used if both players wish to avoid player killing.

this right here, is the solution to everything. Amazing job.

Naruto - Legend of the Bijuu's - Part I - OOC

the only reason why madara is busted is because
Edo Tensei=Infinite Chakra/Never dies
He had rennegan which gave him massive amounts of chakra(especially since Nagato mastered it for him)
and Madara is boss
All the Eternal does is prevents you from going blind, that's all.(If you use Izanagi/Izanami, you will still go blind)
Also the justu's still use up the same amount of chakra regardless of Eternal, so using Amaterasu will still drain the shit tons of chakra from Oda.

Naruto - Legend of the Bijuu's - Part I - OOC

I mean Kabuto's attack against Itachi/Sasuke( which was Sage Art: White Rage Technique) made even Sasuke and itachi unable to move. Only reason why sasuke was saved because Itachi was able to use Susano'o, but if you arn't prepared for the blinding light, you will suffer the consequences regardless on your ocular powless

Naruto - Legend of the Bijuu's - Part I - OOC

Well a kage against 4 others, he needs to be a little stronger to be able to handle that if that ever occurs
plus the way everything is going, me and Shadow did a good job on this plot. you'll see what i mean in a while

BKburke said
We don't need to mention the first hokage and how powerful he was for a kage.

^that too

Naruto - Legend of the Bijuu's - Part I - OOC

if my character doesn't have the power/speed to grab that sword and move it out of harms way then yes death is imminent.