Avatar of ItMeGritty
  • Last Seen: 4 yrs ago
  • Joined: 6 yrs ago
  • Posts: 263 (0.12 / day)
  • VMs: 1
  • Username history
    1. ItMeGritty 6 yrs ago

Status

Recent Statuses

5 yrs ago
Current you thought you could get rid of me
5 yrs ago
canonically speaking, the most powerful DMC character is the woman who convinced Virgil to have unprotected sex with a human
3 likes
5 yrs ago
whatever it is you're doing it wrong
5 yrs ago
sorry, sharing a pie? Piece was never an option
5 yrs ago
Show me an aesthetic better than Lego Rock Raiders. Go on. I'll wait.

Bio

User has no bio, yet

Most Recent Posts

@Ammokkx

Ok.

Could you stop being dismissive as a courtesy? You're making me feel bad.
@Ammokkx

Id appreciate it if you didn't just dismiss all of my ideas with a 'nah'.

You wanted me to contribute which I have been doing.

Anyways, I like the idea of running mostly commons, uncommons and junk rares.
@Ammokkx

We could use original printings. Short prints could be counted as rares. We could even count rare and above as just 'rare'.
<Snipped quote by ItMeGritty>

nah


Could you be a little more constructive as to why this is a bad idea? I think it fits what youre going for.
If cards are valuable we could limit deck builds based on rarity.

3-4 Uncommons
1-2 Rares
0-1 Ultra and above
I am asking honest questions, I assume you have jotnotes or a brief summary of what you have decided so far.

Do you have a google doc by chance?
So we're in a gang right? Won't we be dueling each other?
Asking when we were gonna start was a legitimate question. I had only just joined the thread afterall.
theres 10 pages

im picking up from here

do not take this as lack of interest

i just dont want to be dragged down by teddy um
@Ammokkx

Had a look.

I assume all the decks have to be like your example?
© 2007-2024
BBCode Cheatsheet