SaintArey

The Iron Curtain: A Cold War NRP

Dutchbag said
Yes, but that shouldn't give the green light to sandbox a generation of leaders doing exactly what the player wants in perfect harmony. Research should be done first.

Not if they are reasonable as imagine most of the people here are. Its not like America is going to elect a communist president or whatever. As long as the ideology is right it should be ok. I would advise a heavy majority of real life leaders but sometimes things just change. Like FLC says below, always try and find someone real first.

The Iron Curtain: A Cold War NRP

Jannah said
Well yea, that's what I mean. Those that are outside both NATO's and Warsaw Pact's influence could be used later on for that purpose. That was kind of the point of the Cold War, an ideological battle to get as many over to your side as you can.

Great, I'm a full advocate for fighting in/over player nations as much if not more than npc ones.

The Iron Curtain: A Cold War NRP

Not sure about the npc thing, I am sure non-aligned players could have a great deal of fun getting each block to try and win them over with money and weapons.

The Iron Curtain: A Cold War NRP

India,
Colombia,
Sudan,

Cold War NRP, anyone?

I suppose 3 choices is fair. Ordered by preference. Would prefer 1950 than the day after Yalta.
India
Mexico
Japan

Cold War NRP, anyone?

Btw, Dibs on India. :p

World in Revolution - 1900

We're not going to have to transfer everything to the NRP section are we?

Cold War NRP, anyone?

I'm up for it. would prefer historical. I don't mind helping to research stats but I would be a poor co-gm.

World in Revolution - 1900

I have to agree, Its near impossible to get treaties worked out between the update and the orders, back before the wipe almost everyone had one every turn now not so much. Plus extra time in between would probably mean more people post in the IC like they did before, you cant complain about a richer rp.

World in Revolution - 1900

*nevermind*