Sanctus Spooki

Word association Game!

Punishment.

Word association Game!

Predator

Word association Game!

*haha*

Please.

The Political Thread

Libya had a civil war and was pummeled by NATO missile strikes, just saying.

And apartheid while racist to the extreme is not exactly an entirely tyrannical government, while they faced condemnation over their obviously racist laws, was still on good terms with much of the 'civilized world

I should have finished reading, I just saw Libya and my brain started going "lalalalalala"

Underrated and Overrated Video Games

That was my guess based upon the tidbits I've gathered from more interested folk then myself.

The Political Thread

Based upon previous experience, I'd say they are on the right track...
nytimes.com/1994/10/19/world/clinton-…
washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/…
armscontrol.org/factsheets/dprkchron

Plus that Libya statement, whether a flub or not, highlighted the fears already held by the NK Government.

My personal belief is that for a long term rather than short term solution (of the peaceful variety... Relatively peaceful), one would need to be able to convince a large portion of the upper echelons to accept a sizeable payout, combined with international amnesty from their multitudes of human rights violations, in exchange for a transfer of power. (The difficulty here is: finding a person/group/nation that would be acceptable to all major parties involved, it is tempting to propose reunification, but I don't think China is quite ready to lose their buffer state.) Even were this agreed to, its likely some military action would be required. The primary goal of this plan would be to make it possible to dismantle the NK Government without having SK turned into a "Sea of Fire".

The question to whether this is possible or not is how power-mad the NK leaders have become, whether they truly enjoy their tyranny (Undoubtedly some of them do) or if it was simply the case of making the best of a bad situation, as some Nazi's did. If we can find enough leaders willing to accept the deal (Which would likely need to be brokered in secret, and in piecemeal stages to avoid potentially alerting the more fanatical leaders) it should be relatively easy to infiltrate, and eliminate, whatever opposition to the regime change that remains. Obviously, certain high priority targets, Kim Jong Un for example, as well as whichever Military leaders directly control the batteries arrayed along the DMZ, must be acquired, or if acquisition is impossible, would need to be eliminated in the initial stages of the operation -though I tend to think without Un, this plan would probably be unworkable.

"But Spooki! If we can turn all those leaders to our side, is it really necessary to displace them?"

Yes. Unless the security of these leaders is 100% guaranteed, it is more preferable to them that the status quo remains unchanged. Kim Jong Un, the beloved Supreme Leader, would likely suffer a fate similar to Mussolini if North Korea were to undergo a sudden and dramatic liberalization, as would many if not all high government officials. Basically you would be dealing with an Oriental spring (which China can absolutely not allow to happen on its border)

Or we can continue to practice "Strategic Patience" Thanks Obama, now they have atom bombs hydrogen bombs, and ICBM's

The other option is a series of precision nuclear strikes (bit of an oxymoron that) Combined with somehow disabling the entire DMZ Arsenal in what I would consider to be the most well coordinated large scale operation of all time.

Of course none of this happens without the go ahead from China, which I imagine is driving Trump absolutely bonkers

Edit: it just occurred to me that this premise is based upon the idea that no Tyranical Government that I know of has been displaced through entirely peaceful means, if anyone has an example of one, it would be much appreciated.

The ERP Discussion

I think you've confused the pure and impure tbh. Us pure folk could hardly write a sentence you'd find in an erotic novel, or read a page, without feeling the need to wash our hands and bleach our eyes.

The ERP Discussion

I believe what has to be noted is that there is really two (maybe three) types of ERPs.

Firstly you will have the erotica, or literotica cause that's a cool word...

@NuttsnBolts

On a slightly more serious note, I think people should keep it private in most situations...

On second thought @Lady Amalthea pretty much summed up my own thoughts regarding the matter.

<Snipped quote by Fabricant451>

I don't know about you guys but this always made me think 'yeah you're just trynna have a quick wank/shlick before bed and just want me to write some good shit for you while you do the bare minimum to keep me writing'.

<Snipped quote by Fabricant451>

And then this is what happens when two of those 'I only wanna JACK/SHLICK MY ASS OFF and not WRITE' people meet and agree to roleplay...

@Odin

The question is, how does one advertise that as a highly literate chap/chapette, not only do we desire to shlick, we also desire to create a literary work of art? ... and now I kinda wanna try making a copypasta on the subtle intricacies of ERP lol.

Frokane's Mildly Politcal Hangout Thread

Hey, if we're just talking armchair psychology, you should have no problem with countering my laughable and indefensible claims.

Of course, it's much easier to simply dismiss and deride those claims, rather than potentially engage in a conversation you are ill-prepared for.

So I will carry on with the popcorn-lurking and snide comments, and leave you to your attention seeking. Carry on, and keep having fun. :)

Frokane's Mildly Politcal Hangout Thread

You really do get a kick out of trying to aggravate people don't you? Ah well, can't fault you for a trait we both share... You could try some level of finesse though.

<Snipped quote by Sanctus Spooki>
I'm on my phone with a small screen, I always do a lot of posts with a lot of edits. You must be new here. Feel free to talk about some politics.

Because as much fun as Im having, this isnt actually a roman coliseum, if youre not discussing anything politcally relevant, Id appreciate if you kept your comments about me to yourself.

EDIT: I half take that back, you are absolutely allowed to make comments about me, my memes and my argument style. I'm saying that you cant ONLY come in here and shit on me without doing anything else. This is a mildly political hangout thread so in addition to everything you are doing, as the thread host, I ask you to be mildly political like everyone else here is.

@Dynamo Frokane

Sounding a bit defensive there, and a bit paranoid, I made one comment directed at you, in light jest, there was no complaint when I made the claim that you and Kratesis were both being equally petty.

Ahh so while you can occasionally engage in some good old-fashioned fun at others expense, I can't? or at least, not at your expense?

So in other words, If I explain how you are making yourself look like a fool, I am free to leave?

Please though, keep talking about how your memes get on everyone's nerves (Did I once mention memes?). I noticed you pointed the finger at the starterpack memes though, when Kratesis mentioned 'snarky memes'(Sorry if my meme knowledge is lacking, but couldn't the condescending wonka also be considered snarky, or any other number of passive-aggressive meme's you post?) I wonder why you immediately focused upon that specific meme, something like a freudian slip, if I had to hazard a guess.

I think you may be becoming a tad overstimulated - firing on all cylinders? In neurological terms, that's a step away from a panic attack. No I don't think you are going to have a panic attack. I'm guessing you feel assaulted on all sides by inferior minds, and that, combined with the rush of endorphins you experience when you prove someone 'wrong' over the internet is inhibiting your ability to recognise when you are acting the fool. Much the same way someone can think they are doing wonderfully in a fight, despite being destroyed. Feel free to argue but "You're not very good at this, You must be new here, his forgetful ass, etc etc, doesn't do much to support the idea of you considering this to be a conversation among equals, or of you being invested in a calm and rational discussion.

While we are on the subject of brain juices, though you and Poohead both likely have slightly lower hormone levels than what you did in the prime of puberty, actual hormonal decrease in males generally doesn't begin until approximately the age of 30 at a rate of about 1% a year. Poohead, and yourself, are both still very much hormonal young people (You really think a couple years of uwntsumfukbby is enough for the human population to survive before healthcare?)

<Snipped quote by SleepingSilence>

Lets see how brief that turns out to be.

@Dynamo Frokane

'Mildly Political' Damn, it's starting to look like you use the title of this thread as a shield to protect yourself from criticism while leaning heavily on the mildly whenever you wish to spew your own venom at someone.

P.S. Can I go back to popcorn lurking and snide comments? Because it's much more fun to make notes to myself about a person's mental state than to have to try and make someone come to grips with it themselves, at least over the internet. I did try and tell you to cool off in my own asshat way, it's not my fault that in your defensive state you immediately jumped to a broken spirit (Which believe me, I doubt there is anything in the world that can break your spirit, your own egotistical posts have explained as much) instead of taking the time to consider what I may have meant. Endorphins do that, they also make you feel good. Too much of a good thing?