Please don't compare your style to mine, that is legitimately insulting.
The main difference between you and me is that I react and you retract. I put legitimate effort into including your character as a viable member of the roleplay by reacting to your nonsense before I finally got tired of it. Most if not all of my defensive pieces were placed on the board and have been in play since the beginning of this engagement if not the thread itself, even if you failed to notice them until later they were always primed to react to your offense. Meanwhile when you aren't trying to fit entire actions into your previous turn you are retracting your previous actions to better suit your needs, and that's if we're lucky enough for you to react at all.
The thing you don't seem to get is that if you retract your action you also retract my reaction. In simple language every time you decided that you were throwing instead of swiping or screaming instead of licking you left the same defense I used before free to keep defending. You never committed to removing my options from play, you never seemed to plan beyond the moment, and your moves rarely connected to one another in a meaningful way. If something didn't work you just rewound time and tried again, why would I change my game plan for that, not only do I not have to but you made it clear that if I did you wouldn't give a flying fuck about it anyways.
I'm not entirely sure you're being malicious with this either. I mean there are points where you blatantly go out of your way to disrespect what your opponent wrote but I feel like a legitimate powergamer would have done something clever with all of the chances you've been given. I had one guy delete my character's profile to remove all of my powers from play, it was hilarious especially considering my profile was still posted for everyone to see, but there was something of an idea hiding beneath the mountain of salt. You spent three turns straight charging a defensive formation that you acknowledged was there, never attempting to bypass it or even destroy it, and only once attempting to disregard it.
You could make a legitimate complaint about Satori's versatility but in this thread the GM has an entire army of monsters and one of the party is/was a legitimate reality bender. It's not my fault you decided to join with an overstuffed snausage whose major selling point is that he sweats a lot and somehow thought you could bully everyone else into submission, and if you had joined with one of your character creator monstrosities it might have worked, but as it stands you're playing something that doesn't even legs or arms against characters who don't even need arms and legs. Besides even if you really wanted to complain about her kit, it's readily available in other threads and you had plenty of time to reconsider joining after I posted, but she's only really used two of a dozen plus tools available to her.
Sorry, not sorry.
The main difference between you and me is that I react and you retract. I put legitimate effort into including your character as a viable member of the roleplay by reacting to your nonsense before I finally got tired of it. Most if not all of my defensive pieces were placed on the board and have been in play since the beginning of this engagement if not the thread itself, even if you failed to notice them until later they were always primed to react to your offense. Meanwhile when you aren't trying to fit entire actions into your previous turn you are retracting your previous actions to better suit your needs, and that's if we're lucky enough for you to react at all.
The thing you don't seem to get is that if you retract your action you also retract my reaction. In simple language every time you decided that you were throwing instead of swiping or screaming instead of licking you left the same defense I used before free to keep defending. You never committed to removing my options from play, you never seemed to plan beyond the moment, and your moves rarely connected to one another in a meaningful way. If something didn't work you just rewound time and tried again, why would I change my game plan for that, not only do I not have to but you made it clear that if I did you wouldn't give a flying fuck about it anyways.
I'm not entirely sure you're being malicious with this either. I mean there are points where you blatantly go out of your way to disrespect what your opponent wrote but I feel like a legitimate powergamer would have done something clever with all of the chances you've been given. I had one guy delete my character's profile to remove all of my powers from play, it was hilarious especially considering my profile was still posted for everyone to see, but there was something of an idea hiding beneath the mountain of salt. You spent three turns straight charging a defensive formation that you acknowledged was there, never attempting to bypass it or even destroy it, and only once attempting to disregard it.
You could make a legitimate complaint about Satori's versatility but in this thread the GM has an entire army of monsters and one of the party is/was a legitimate reality bender. It's not my fault you decided to join with an overstuffed snausage whose major selling point is that he sweats a lot and somehow thought you could bully everyone else into submission, and if you had joined with one of your character creator monstrosities it might have worked, but as it stands you're playing something that doesn't even legs or arms against characters who don't even need arms and legs. Besides even if you really wanted to complain about her kit, it's readily available in other threads and you had plenty of time to reconsider joining after I posted, but she's only really used two of a dozen plus tools available to her.
Sorry, not sorry.