• Last Seen: 7 yrs ago
  • Old Guild Username: Turtlicious
  • Joined: 11 yrs ago
  • Posts: 916 (0.23 / day)
  • VMs: 0
  • Username history
    1. Turtlicious 11 yrs ago

Status

User has no status, yet

Bio

User has no bio, yet

Most Recent Posts

The Nexerus said
As many as is necessary. The fault will be squarely on those deciding not to support themselves.It isn't the responsibility of the government to sustain the idle. That's both unfair and unsustainable.


lmao, Yeah fuck kids for mum's decisions imho. -Nex in TYOL 2014

i mean, why dont they just bootstrap?

can't they just go buy bootstraps?

what do you mean they cant afford bootstraps?

lmao, fucking lazy poors. wont even go out and buy bootstraps
Cool, how many people are you ok with going hungry to catch the 4% of lazy sub-human scum who dare to be poor?

How many kids are you ok with not getting birthday presents/stuff to support themselves?

How many people are you ok with being deprived of basic human rights, (food, shelter, water, power, internet?)
I used to smoke Camel Wides back in my day.
The fact that only one of you got that it was a joke is really depressing. Please don't make me stoop any lower then I have too, at least try to meet me at my level.
Mtntopview said
Why do people try and find deeper meanings out of things!? It's a movie about a kingdom that gets covered in ice, and is thawed by love and shit. Don't go deeper than that.


Yeah, fuck thinking "deeper" or "critically" symbolism is such bullshit.
To be fair, a lot of people conflate being evil and being a homosexual.
Actually, now that it's upset someone who wants to be a whiny turd, I remember this is the perfect place for it.

It's better then the majority of posts in OT.

Deffo better then cider's post.
A.) I just said I haven't really studied on the subject to give a strong opinion.

B.) I didn't use the car analogy

C.) All I was saying is that it was a poor analogy, outside of the conversation at hand. Like, no you should not spend money to fix your car if you can save that money to buy a new one. You should drive that car until it breaks then go on the bus, don't keep spending money on a thing because you have it.
Dervish said Let's use a bit of a quick analogy here, if you're driving a car with a leaky oil pan and exhaust leak, but can't afford a new car to replace it, you don't just keep driving without fixing the problems of your current car because the money it would cost to fix it could be used towards a down payment for a new car. Yes, I know that you can get a good price on a lot of good used cars and a decent down payment with the money it would cost to fix the original car, but sadly that doesn't directly apply to the issue at hand. There aren't used cars when it comes to the energy industry.


Isn't it a sunk cost fallacy to keep spending money on a broken thing you plan to replace, because you've already spent money on it?
© 2007-2024
BBCode Cheatsheet