>Many paragraphs giving my opinion on the subject at hand
K-97 said
(Cause we haven't had one of these in a while)
>Begins with a provocative sentence detailing his opinion on *the important topic of the day* (Now with added assumptions and misinformation).
>Dissection of assumptions and misinformation
>Explanation of how you're wrong
>Further explanation of correct information
Overwatch said
>insults the above poster, defending their idea with wikipedia links.
>Counterargument and shaming for use of ad hominems
>Mockery of poor sources
>Challenge to find scholarly sources instead
Overwatch said
>Gets passive aggressive
>Gets active aggressive
Overwatch said
>starts to insult the op's character
>Declaration of your argument being garbage because you can't even back it up without personal attacks
>Edited in message responding to posts made while the above was being typed
Sherlock Holmes said
> Gets slightly irritated, but doesn't let on.
> Threatens to close thread.
>Promise to keep it chill in the future of the thread
CidTheKid said
Point
>Counter with two points
CidTheKid said
By
>Three counterpoints and a Youtube video of a lecture on the subject
CidTheKid said
Point
>Acknowledgement that this is an okay point
>Counterpoint anyway
CidTheKid said
Rebuttal
>Four point counter with two links to scholarly studies on the subject
CidTheKid said
Ad hominem.
>Facepalm reaction gif