Edit: Ignore this.

Kaga said
...I don't get it.

I edited it. Something weird happened.

This can only end well...

Guys guess which state I live in.

natsumehack said
Guys guess which state I live in.

Bedlam is not a state in the U.S.A.

Kaga said
...I don't get it.

An amendment to the Castle Law Doctrine in which you are legally allowed to use acceptable force to prevent, or terminate a Officer of the Peace's actions if they are acting in excessive measures.

IE: If the Police kick in your door, without warrant, and you legitimately feel they are a threat to your life? You can legally return force against them.
If a Police Officer is using excessive force to arrest you unlawfully, or someone else, you may intervene. Such as if an Officer is curb stomping someone's head? Yeah. You can legally stop that. If an Officer draws their service pistol on a handcuffed man, who was sitting on the pavement? Yeah, you can stop that.

This amendment does not protect you if you are actually committing a crime, or if the Officers have a legitimate warrant for your arrest, nor the motions of force necessary to handcuff someone*.

*Breaking someones arm of course, is not part of those motions of force.

In the most plain of words: A while ago, an Indiana Judge ruled that Castle Doctrine effectively did not matter if it was the Police unlawfully breaking into your home, instead of anyone else. Supreme Court laughed at that. Police are now treated as if they were anyone else (Supposedly).

Goldmarble said
An amendment to the Castle Law Doctrine in which you are legally allowed to use acceptable force to prevent, or terminate a Officer of the Peace's actions if they are acting in excessive measures. IE: If the Police kick in your door, without warrant, and you legitimately feel they are a threat to your life? You can legally return force against them.If a Police Officer is using excessive force to arrest you unlawfully, or someone else, you may intervene. Such as if an Officer is curb stomping someone's head? Yeah. You can legally stop that. If an Officer draws their service pistol on a handcuffed man, who was sitting on the pavement? Yeah, you can stop that.This amendment does not protect you if you are actually committing a crime, or if the Officers have a legitimate warrant for your arrest, nor the motions of force necessary to handcuff someone*.*Breaking someones arm of course, is not part of those motions of force.In the most plain of words: A while ago, an Indiana Judge ruled that Castle Doctrine effectively did not matter if it was the Police unlawfully breaking into your home, instead of anyone else. Supreme Court laughed at that. Police are now treated as if they were anyone else (Supposedly).

I get it now. When I first saw the thread, there was no Youtube video and only a link to a post reply box on a thread with the same title as this one but no visible posts, followed by the same set of gifs. Hence my confusion.

Sorry, I should probably edit that post now.

Kaga said
I get it . When I first saw the thread, there was no Youtube video and only a link to a post reply box on a thread with the same title as this one but no visible posts, followed by the same set of gifs. Hence my confusion.Sorry, I should probably edit that post now.

Yes I'm sorry. I don't know what happened, but I fixed it now.

ActRaiserTheReturned said
Yes I'm sorry. I don't know what happened, but I fixed it now.

Yeah, I see that it's fixed. I probably should've edited my own post as soon as you did so.

Goldmarble said
An amendment to the Castle Law Doctrine in which you are legally allowed to use acceptable force to prevent, or terminate a Officer of the Peace's actions if they are acting in excessive measures. IE: If the Police kick in your door, without warrant, and you legitimately feel they are a threat to your life? You can legally return force against them.If a Police Officer is using excessive force to arrest you unlawfully, or someone else, you may intervene. Such as if an Officer is curb stomping someone's head? Yeah. You can legally stop that. If an Officer draws their service pistol on a handcuffed man, who was sitting on the pavement? Yeah, you can stop that.This amendment does not protect you if you are actually committing a crime, or if the Officers have a legitimate warrant for your arrest, nor the motions of force necessary to handcuff someone*.*Breaking someones arm of course, is not part of those motions of force.In the most plain of words: A while ago, an Indiana Judge ruled that Castle Doctrine effectively did not matter if it was the Police unlawfully breaking into your home, instead of anyone else. Supreme Court laughed at that. Police are now treated as if they were anyone else (Supposedly).

Oh.

That's what it means

Cool.

rpg101 said

This needs to play everytime someone opens Spam for the first time.