1. Home
  2. Advanced Roleplay

[OOC] Spiritum Aeternum; or The Ramshackle Monster Hunters Page 5

Join Status: Apply
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Danko
Raw —
Avatar of Danko

Danko

Member Seen 4 days ago
@The New Yorker Thank you for the acceptance and I will post it there now.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by The New Yorker
Raw —
GM
Avatar of The New Yorker

The New Yorker Treading the Rhetorical Minefield

Member Seen 8 yrs ago
@The New Yorker Thank you for the acceptance and I will post it there now.


Your character has been added to the cast list. You may now post IC at your leisure.
Hidden 10 yrs ago → 10 yrs ago Post by TheDuncanMorgan
Raw —
Avatar of TheDuncanMorgan

TheDuncanMorgan Boo

Member Seen 2 yrs ago
@The New Yorker Sorry for repeating myself

What is the max number of role players allowed for this role play?
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by The New Yorker
Raw —
GM
Avatar of The New Yorker

The New Yorker Treading the Rhetorical Minefield

Member Seen 8 yrs ago
@The New Yorker Sorry for repeating myself

What is the max number of role players allowed for this role play?


I'm sorry for not noticing you've asked it.

There isn't a hard limit. I believe this story can handle as many people as we have now. Perhaps one or two more. I tend to insulate myself in case anyone drops out, however. So any estimation as to how many characters we need vs. how many characters we have can only be made once all or some have posted.

I suppose I should give you a solid answer. A hesitantly stated 9 PC's will have to suffice for now. We currently have 7.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by TheDuncanMorgan
Raw —
Avatar of TheDuncanMorgan

TheDuncanMorgan Boo

Member Seen 2 yrs ago
@The New Yorker Thanks :)
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by SirBeowulf
Raw —
Avatar of SirBeowulf

SirBeowulf What a load of Donk.

Member Seen 2 yrs ago

Just feelin' like shit today. Sicknesses and what not, can't really focus on my duties.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by The New Yorker
Raw —
GM
Avatar of The New Yorker

The New Yorker Treading the Rhetorical Minefield

Member Seen 8 yrs ago

Just feelin' like shit today. Sicknesses and what not, can't really focus on my duties.


That's fine. Perhaps leave the announcements for when the posts are completed from now on. I've learned that after a career in embarrassment.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by MacabreFox
Raw —
Avatar of MacabreFox

MacabreFox Wee Witchy Woo

Member Seen 1 day ago
@The New Yorker Any idea as to how long our characters will be on this ship before reaching Morocco?
Hidden 10 yrs ago → 10 yrs ago Post by The New Yorker
Raw —
GM
Avatar of The New Yorker

The New Yorker Treading the Rhetorical Minefield

Member Seen 8 yrs ago
@The New Yorker Any idea as to how long our characters will be on this ship before reaching Morocco?


Roughly a week in story time, probably less. As for rounds of posts, it depends on the PC's. How long does everyone want to be here, how long does it take to respond to certain situations we come across? My best guess is 4-5 rounds of posting, but that could be wrong. I generally don't like answering questions like that because they're impossible to answer accurately.

More importantly, whenever someone is asking it, it's not a good sign for morale. I assure you, there will be plenty of things to keep us busy while on the open ocean.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by SirBeowulf
Raw —
Avatar of SirBeowulf

SirBeowulf What a load of Donk.

Member Seen 2 yrs ago

Thar she blows! Off the starboard bow!
2x Laugh Laugh
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by The New Yorker
Raw —
GM
Avatar of The New Yorker

The New Yorker Treading the Rhetorical Minefield

Member Seen 8 yrs ago
@TheWizardLizard has unfortunately left the RP, and so has been removed from the cast list. I appreciate your contributions, and your respectful timely withdrawal.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by MacabreFox
Raw —
Avatar of MacabreFox

MacabreFox Wee Witchy Woo

Member Seen 1 day ago
@The New Yorker Ok (: I was just wondering. Oh I don't doubt that our morale will be down by any means. If anything I'm excited to get another round up of posting!
1x Like Like
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by SirBeowulf
Raw —
Avatar of SirBeowulf

SirBeowulf What a load of Donk.

Member Seen 2 yrs ago
And posted. TAKE IT. TAKE IT YOU DIRTY SLU-

Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by The New Yorker
Raw —
GM
Avatar of The New Yorker

The New Yorker Treading the Rhetorical Minefield

Member Seen 8 yrs ago
And posted. TAKE IT. TAKE IT YOU DIRTY SLU-


Not only will I take it, I'll thank you afterwards. Well done. I can already see a slap in Wes' future.

@The New Yorker Ok (: I was just wondering. Oh I don't doubt that our morale will be down by any means. If anything I'm excited to get another round up of posting!


Don't feel any pressure to wait for anyone else. There aren't organized rounds of posting, so feel free to get whipped up in you inspiration. As I should have said at the beginning, collaborative posts are encouraged!
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by MacabreFox
Raw —
Avatar of MacabreFox

MacabreFox Wee Witchy Woo

Member Seen 1 day ago
@The New Yorker Well as you now know, @TheDuncanMorgan and I will be collaborating for our next post. But now everyone else knows as well. A master-piece in the process but hopefully not to horribly lengthy.
1x Thank Thank
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Fairess
Raw —
Avatar of Fairess

Fairess

Member Seen 2 yrs ago
@MacabreFox
Out of curiosity, were you planning on having Artemisia respond or react to Wes or Catarina in your post? It's just going to be really awkward if she and Omerdo go off on a tangent while they're just standing there.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by The New Yorker
Raw —
GM
Avatar of The New Yorker

The New Yorker Treading the Rhetorical Minefield

Member Seen 8 yrs ago
@MacabreFox
Out of curiosity, were you planning on having Artemisia respond or react to Wes or Catarina in your post? It's just going to be really awkward if she and Omerdo go off on a tangent while they're just standing there.


Its a matter of how they write it. Honestly, it seems like these conversations could realistically be addressed with a "thank you," and a shy nod.

RPing is a collaborative medium. And, certainly, outright ignoring the dialogue of others is rude. But we have to consider the interests of others as well. If a player feels like their character wouldn't engage heavily in a certain discussion, and does so respectfully, we ought to respect that. A silver lining in the whole business is that you and SirBeowulf can spark up a conversation of your own.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by MacabreFox
Raw —
Avatar of MacabreFox

MacabreFox Wee Witchy Woo

Member Seen 1 day ago
<Snipped quote by Fairess>

Its a matter of how they write it. Honestly, it seems like these conversations could realistically be addressed with a "thank you," and a shy nod.

RPing is a collaborative medium. And, certainly, outright ignoring the dialogue of others is rude. But we have to consider the interests of others as well. If a player feels like their character wouldn't engage heavily in a certain discussion, and does so respectfully, we ought to respect that. A silver lining in the whole business is that you and SirBeowulf can spark up a conversation of your own.

@Fairess@The New Yorker
Perfectly said. However, I intend to kill two birds with one stone. I'll address Catarina and Wes, in one post, wherein, Omero, who can freely engage Artemisia on conversation, but I don't think Artemisia would trust him enough no matter what he said to leave the company of good cheer, food and excitement. Then, that would leave either of you the option to respond directly back to me (: or carry on elsewhere. The point of our collab basically is for an introductory dialogue between the two of our characters. Or I would at least assume :
1x Like Like
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Fairess
Raw —
Avatar of Fairess

Fairess

Member Seen 2 yrs ago
<Snipped quote by Fairess>

Its a matter of how they write it. Honestly, it seems like these conversations could realistically be addressed with a "thank you," and a shy nod.

RPing is a collaborative medium. And, certainly, outright ignoring the dialogue of others is rude. But we have to consider the interests of others as well. If a player feels like their character wouldn't engage heavily in a certain discussion, and does so respectfully, we ought to respect that. A silver lining in the whole business is that you and SirBeowulf can spark up a conversation of your own.


The reason I brought it up is not to complain, but to discuss and collaborate. I understand the logic, naturally, but just wanted to see if the doors of conversation were open should Catarina have more to say. A conversation may begin with brevity, but like any confrontation, it may also dip into an actual discussion. It's relevant to know intention in a group setting, particularly so I can plan/write accordingly.

@MacabreFox
That sounds good to me! I'll get a feel for the flow of things once we see your post.
1x Like Like
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by The New Yorker
Raw —
GM
Avatar of The New Yorker

The New Yorker Treading the Rhetorical Minefield

Member Seen 8 yrs ago
<Snipped quote by The New Yorker>
@Fairess@The New Yorker
Perfectly said. However, I intend to kill two birds with one stone. I'll address Catarina and Wes, in one post, wherein, Omero, who can freely engage Artemisia on conversation, but I don't think Artemisia would trust him enough no matter what he said to leave the company of good cheer, food and excitement. Then, that would leave either of you the option to respond directly back to me (: or carry on elsewhere. The point of our collab basically is for an introductory dialogue between the two of our characters. Or I would at least assume :


I couldn't have of a better solution! Well done.
↑ Top
© 2007-2024
BBCode Cheatsheet