There are only so many thing to worry about, to believe, to contemplate,
as one of 7 billion mortals on this planet, I have adopted my share.
Allow yourself to broaden your perspective by immersing yourself in my world,
Immortality in the Flesh: should one only be aware of the effects of sothenliness - inclusive of excessive work, and improper work techniques - , intoxication, sex hormones - such as that from the hormone saturated animal blood which s never drained prior to being sold to you on the market - , and depression & delusion which impair the overall wellbeing of the body ~ Then and only then, one can attain Immortality in the Flesh. This is the general clause of the existence of God, and when contemplated, no other cause of old age is scientifically factual. These are the causes of cellular degeneration.
To elaborate on the clause of Immortality in the Flesh, one would immerse themselves naturally in all of the world religious, excluding none and therein only find wisdom, and see that which is not for it's intended purposes unbiasedly towards scientific principal.
Gravity: If all the observed effects of "gravitational pull" 'studied' within our atmosphere were in fact caused by another solution entirely contrary to the modern theory, then we would not have conflicts such as Binary star systems (the closet star to our solar system), the Moon's of Jupiter and the anomaly of Mar's relationship with said Gas-Giant, mag-levs, Mercury & even our moon, and the annual meteor showers. Without the accepted theory of Gravity we lose none of our scientific observations, but acquire liberty and scientific method.
Applying observed effects to a theory, is not scientific. And when using patterns of said observations to predict
continued patterns, that does not indicate the theory is logical, only that the observations are at least semi-factual. In order to prove a theory to be logical, one must use the theory to present a method of finding facts, and then proving the facts afterwards. This is not how "Gravity" was 'discovered' nor 'proven', as well ass carbon dating, evolution and other ridiculous notions which are not products of scientific method.
Nibiru: The only description of Nibiru in ancient text indicates that Pluto is very capably, and potentially plausibly Nibiru. I have been unable to find a model of the solar system with accurate and dated movements of the celestial bodies. Potentially the crossing of Nibiru was in fact Pluto passing the earth at it's nearest proximity in orbit, And potentially this may happen again.
Nibiru was described to be a "solar system", and it has 3-4 satellites. Furthermore, if it is aa giant ice-ball, it may shine when in proximity to the sun and the earth. This indicates Pluto is a suitable candidate to be labelled the mystical planet, Nibiru which was spoken of by the ancestors of India & Sri Lanka.
Moreover, as a Creationist, I believe that it is Pluto's destiny to collide with Mercury or Mar's, and even potentially but unlikely on of the moons of Jupiter or even or own. As a Miraculous event prepared by the Creator.
Dwarves:
WereWolves, Werecats, and the Werebear.
I preference Werewolves over werecats. I have had a drawn out discussion about it here already, where I find I best elaborate on my emotions.
1.)The werewolf is a pack animal. The werecat is not.
2.)The werewolf is aware of it's surroundings. A werecat must watch them.
3.)The werewolf, orders its pact seniority with simple disputes, and is satisfied knowing it's sub ordinance. The wereCat fight's werecats for its territorial claim, and even more so to breed (this must be reflected in the psychological politic affairs of the beast).
The werebear, can presumable fight a pack of wolves. And to it's satisfaction win with it's life. Though it needs to limit the fighting environment to it's preferences. Shockingly, it takes less werecats to kill a werebear than wolves.
A werecat is not superior to a werewolf, BUT his catlike reflexes account for his success. The first strike wins = end of story; regardless of the damage suffered on the winners end.
Werecats are often much higher on a political scale, because they do not carry baggage (their pack) which can impair networking & negotiation, but they is just common not rule. Werebears, often climb to very satisfactory seats of authority, and their so rare, and so variably distressed a werewolf might not even recognize the odor.
~~~
As for other werecreatures - lizards, rodents/"apes"/or marsupials**or birds{harpes}, critters(hooved), amphibians or other mammals... The archtypes are to be discovered in due time. Analytically, not by an author's insubordinate preference.
~
~
I will return in due time, promptly, to add more to this list. I suppose I will add it as a comment, so please withhold your responses and remarks.
If you have anything you would like me to reveal concerning what you might want to know about me or my opinion, or something I mentioned above, please message me, or give me a moment to finish my entry, and I'll indulge in your curious contribution.
as one of 7 billion mortals on this planet, I have adopted my share.
Allow yourself to broaden your perspective by immersing yourself in my world,
Immortality in the Flesh: should one only be aware of the effects of sothenliness - inclusive of excessive work, and improper work techniques - , intoxication, sex hormones - such as that from the hormone saturated animal blood which s never drained prior to being sold to you on the market - , and depression & delusion which impair the overall wellbeing of the body ~ Then and only then, one can attain Immortality in the Flesh. This is the general clause of the existence of God, and when contemplated, no other cause of old age is scientifically factual. These are the causes of cellular degeneration.
To elaborate on the clause of Immortality in the Flesh, one would immerse themselves naturally in all of the world religious, excluding none and therein only find wisdom, and see that which is not for it's intended purposes unbiasedly towards scientific principal.
Gravity: If all the observed effects of "gravitational pull" 'studied' within our atmosphere were in fact caused by another solution entirely contrary to the modern theory, then we would not have conflicts such as Binary star systems (the closet star to our solar system), the Moon's of Jupiter and the anomaly of Mar's relationship with said Gas-Giant, mag-levs, Mercury & even our moon, and the annual meteor showers. Without the accepted theory of Gravity we lose none of our scientific observations, but acquire liberty and scientific method.
Applying observed effects to a theory, is not scientific. And when using patterns of said observations to predict
continued patterns, that does not indicate the theory is logical, only that the observations are at least semi-factual. In order to prove a theory to be logical, one must use the theory to present a method of finding facts, and then proving the facts afterwards. This is not how "Gravity" was 'discovered' nor 'proven', as well ass carbon dating, evolution and other ridiculous notions which are not products of scientific method.
Nibiru: The only description of Nibiru in ancient text indicates that Pluto is very capably, and potentially plausibly Nibiru. I have been unable to find a model of the solar system with accurate and dated movements of the celestial bodies. Potentially the crossing of Nibiru was in fact Pluto passing the earth at it's nearest proximity in orbit, And potentially this may happen again.
Nibiru was described to be a "solar system", and it has 3-4 satellites. Furthermore, if it is aa giant ice-ball, it may shine when in proximity to the sun and the earth. This indicates Pluto is a suitable candidate to be labelled the mystical planet, Nibiru which was spoken of by the ancestors of India & Sri Lanka.
Moreover, as a Creationist, I believe that it is Pluto's destiny to collide with Mercury or Mar's, and even potentially but unlikely on of the moons of Jupiter or even or own. As a Miraculous event prepared by the Creator.
Dwarves:
WereWolves, Werecats, and the Werebear.
I preference Werewolves over werecats. I have had a drawn out discussion about it here already, where I find I best elaborate on my emotions.
1.)The werewolf is a pack animal. The werecat is not.
2.)The werewolf is aware of it's surroundings. A werecat must watch them.
3.)The werewolf, orders its pact seniority with simple disputes, and is satisfied knowing it's sub ordinance. The wereCat fight's werecats for its territorial claim, and even more so to breed (this must be reflected in the psychological politic affairs of the beast).
The werebear, can presumable fight a pack of wolves. And to it's satisfaction win with it's life. Though it needs to limit the fighting environment to it's preferences. Shockingly, it takes less werecats to kill a werebear than wolves.
A werecat is not superior to a werewolf, BUT his catlike reflexes account for his success. The first strike wins = end of story; regardless of the damage suffered on the winners end.
Werecats are often much higher on a political scale, because they do not carry baggage (their pack) which can impair networking & negotiation, but they is just common not rule. Werebears, often climb to very satisfactory seats of authority, and their so rare, and so variably distressed a werewolf might not even recognize the odor.
~~~
As for other werecreatures - lizards, rodents/"apes"/or marsupials**or birds{harpes}, critters(hooved), amphibians or other mammals... The archtypes are to be discovered in due time. Analytically, not by an author's insubordinate preference.
~
~
I will return in due time, promptly, to add more to this list. I suppose I will add it as a comment, so please withhold your responses and remarks.
If you have anything you would like me to reveal concerning what you might want to know about me or my opinion, or something I mentioned above, please message me, or give me a moment to finish my entry, and I'll indulge in your curious contribution.